There is a big poster at the end of my road, that is trying to recruit drivers, with a starting bonus, and reasonable hours and conditions.
So all the drivers leaving the industry seem to have at least got their point across to someone.
People working in labs today must be speeding up nature significantly on a daily basis.
Perform lots of concurrent experiments, apply different environmental stresses, provide different nutrition, cross different variants you find useful, automate all the processes and tests.
I think the project referenced seems to be deliberately not doing that, to observe the natural speed of change.
The other problem with "Public companies are inherently evil by default" is that saying that "the whole system is wrong", is just providing leaders with an excuse.
Public Companies can serve their customers, shareholders, and look after their employees while still being ethical, there is always a choice, and there are many positive benefits to behaving ethically, for one, it means you are a trustworthy company to deal with.
Waiting longer is ok, it is waiting a random time in a unplanned way with a missed date that is very annoying and becomes expensive, not keeping to schedule will make consumers look elsewhere.
We can clearly see that the current generation of tank the Russians have are useless.
We will spend lots of money on very expensive equally redundant tanks.
We can clearly see that the Russians were unable to gain air superiority.
We will spend lots of money on incredibly expensive new fighters and bombers.
We can clearly see the Russian fleet is bottled up.
We will spend lots of money on new ships and submarines.
If we were interested in defence, all the (small) spending would be on anti tank and anti aircraft missile systems, logistics, and training our national guard, firemen, police and other citizens.
We (the west) vastly outnumber the Russians, have more advanced technology, and hugely larger industrial capacity.
This defence spending is obviously not about Russia, and not about defence, it is firstly and mainly about making money and creating jobs to get ourselves out of the current economic disaster, and secondly about preparing for war with our next official adversary, whoever the Americans decide to nominate for that.
Especially annoying when reams of nonsense also gets 'unexpectedly' sprayed into the web browser of some poor sod using an enterprise app, just because Java is having a bad day. This seems to happen less than it used to a few years ago, so there is some progress going in in software engineering, somewhere.
Interestingly it is the base M1 that is still the most interesting device, lower cost, lower heat, good single core performance, capable of most tasks, and reasonable graphics for a lower power device.
Other fast laptops are all about the heat and the fan noise (my tiny work laptop is the loudest device in my room)
A number of times I have got off the train with a laptop almost on fire in my bag, because windows failed to notice the laptop lid was closed.
Ill be getting the M1 laptop next time I need one.
Reading is a great deal faster than watching videos.
Presumably doubling the speed must also make the presenters sound like chipmunks or voles or something. Perhaps just fiddling with the sound frequency also works.
There is something different or odd about it though.
I don't think anyone is arguing that the low number of Women in tech is not a problem, understanding the root cause is presumably important or we will continue to miss out on a significant talent pool.
I am not a rust fan, but `ever` is a long time, and if operating systems are re-written in rust (which is preferable by far than writing them in C), that is going to be a lot of very widely used code.
The 68k was certainly great fun after 8bit systems, and the x86 was almost just more of the same.
ARM32 is also nice, apart from some corner cases.
I think everything has corner cases, apart from x86 where the whole thing is an ugly mess.
Makes sense, It is also easier to read and understand a book than it was for the author to write it.
You can also think you understand something while you read it and later realize that you misunderstood it.
European settlers trashed an entire continent in a few hundred years; stop and imagine what it must have looked like when they first arrived.
How this ends up filed under Camel art is a mystery.
If people were the same back then:-
Most people hung out and watched the Camels being carved, many watched others `reacting` to the Camel carvings, and a few critiqued the Carvings.
Only a few did the carving.