HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

noworld

no profile record

Submissions

A Way to Challenge the Groupthink of Scholarly Journals

wsj.com
3 points·by noworld·mese scorso·1 comments

NASA Marches Toward Artemis III Mission in 2027, Names Crew Members

nasa.gov
2 points·by noworld·mese scorso·0 comments

Scientists Precisely Edit Human Embryo DNA. Are 'Engineered Babies' Next?

news18.com
3 points·by noworld·mese scorso·0 comments

Ukraine captures enemy Russian position using only robots

nypost.com
7 points·by noworld·3 mesi fa·0 comments

The Emperor Protects: A Warhammer 40k Musical

youtube.com
3 points·by noworld·3 mesi fa·0 comments

Colosseum gets a fresh look recreates the footprints of long-gone columns

apnews.com
4 points·by noworld·4 mesi fa·0 comments

We're Not Ready for Superintelligence

youtube.com
3 points·by noworld·9 mesi fa·0 comments

comments

noworld
·2 mesi fa·discuss
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-special-forces-won-409k-bet...

Another indicator we could track.
noworld
·2 mesi fa·discuss
One time I wrote a game in English.
noworld
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Ban the trading and upping the base pay would probably improve accessibility.
noworld
·2 mesi fa·discuss
https://status.claude.com/
noworld
·4 mesi fa·discuss
‘Unlike most city building games, I'm Sorry Did You Say Street Magic specifically prohibits creating a map due to the historical connections between map-making and colonialism.”

Everyone delete your maps app.
noworld
·4 mesi fa·discuss
Like something out of Fallout
noworld
·4 mesi fa·discuss
Man, if there were only something more reasonable... something in-between letting them spy at will and concentration camps. Hmmm, maybe we will think of something eventually.
noworld
·5 mesi fa·discuss
[flagged]
noworld
·6 mesi fa·discuss
"extraordinary claims/extraordinary evidence" isn't scientific rigor, it's adding qualifiers to make the evaluation of the claim and evidence more subjective.
noworld
·6 mesi fa·discuss
Ah, since the claim contradicts materialism, you get to make up a scenario, present no evidence, then put the burden on the other side. Got it.

There's literally extraordinary evidence in the PDF, you just don't like it.
noworld
·6 mesi fa·discuss
I don't think there's a "guarantee" that it wasn't backdated, but there isn't any evidence of that either.
noworld
·6 mesi fa·discuss
Can you give me some evidence that this document was backdated? I'm not saying the government isn't shady AF, but I just wonder what's behind the immediate jump to "this has to be BS" rather than keeping an open mind.
noworld
·6 mesi fa·discuss
The first PDF is the record of a remote viewing session from 2 days before the USS Stark incident, and it is eerily similar to the incident. The feelings and "atmosphere" (can't think of a better word for it) sound like what you might expect on a ship being attacked by a random missile.

For example:

1. The drawing on p. 7 looks like the superstructure of a warship.

2. The next few pages might describe what it feels like to wonder if your ship is actually under missile attack.

3. On page 10 it records "aircraft--large, multiengined; distant; orbiting; distraction controlled, directed. 'Under orders.'" This USNI article has a little more detail on the AWACS plane detecting the incoming attack: https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2017/j...

There are other similarities, but the CIA report predates the attack, which is especially strange.
noworld
·6 mesi fa·discuss
I always thought this was interesting.

May 15, 1987: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00789R0017000...

May 17, 1987: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Stark_incident
noworld
·6 mesi fa·discuss
I never noticed that the floor of the BoP appears to be mounted on a shock-absorbing suspension
noworld
·9 mesi fa·discuss
[flagged]