otuva · HackerTrans

Oh, ok. But, I thought they were referring to the term freedom of speech as in the first amendment (not includes obscenity, child pornography, fighting words, and the advocacy of imminent lawless action) because they've given an example of cyberbullying

otuva

3 anni fadiscuss

I can't seem to make the connection here.

If everyone is free to speak their minds, how can it be used to silence others?

Even more improbable in the context of cyberbullying. Tyler the Creator's cyberbullying tweet appears to be more relevant than this take.

otuva

3 anni fadiscuss

At this point, it's up to the user to make that trade-off, but most of the players don't have enough information to make that decision.

Sure, I wouldn't want any cheaters on my games, but these systems are not fool-proof and cannot circumvent every single cheater out there.

Dedicated enough cheaters are getting what they want anyway, while the unknowing user is left with a backdoor on their systems (in the event of a compromise)

otuva

3 anni fadiscuss

To my understanding, they demanded ransom a couple of days after the initial breach and not leaked anything yet.

Granted that their motivations are purely financial, they would try to sell first. And if it's not worth anything, they'd release it then.

comments