The left wasn't keeping track of how many of their dislikes were removed from the previous administration. Why not? Because it was a pitiful and legit amount. That's why! Think!
You're extremely obnoxious. If you have access to better long term data that for some reason NOAA lacks in the file I use (see source code), then you should share it.
The best ACE data goes back as far as early 1970s. It shows tiny decline/no trend.
"And in no way should anyone not go back as far as possible for any datasets including tree rings and other indirect methods of sampling further back in the historical records there."
Great! So you have to reject scant non-global thermometer data prior to the satellite age.
"but that still comprises more data than you have made use of to come to your conclusion!"
No! There is NO more data for atlantic hurricanes. If there was, NOAA would have it.
What an obnoxious comment.
I can either go far back in time, and make do with available data, or I can just focus on the satellite era. You see which one I chose.
No scientists have complete data to create an ACE prior to the 1970s.
I made do with what was available and I did a good job.
Scientists claim that peak intensity will go up. Well I have peak low pressure data ...
50000 people would show up to a Trump rally. 15 journalists to a Biden rally. Engaged dislikers are not "bots". And the left has plenty of resources to have their own like-"bots". No, the truth is very simple. There's at least 50000 Trump supporters that will downvote Biden's white house. Even more because ... no travel required.
Some of us aren't privy to such magical knowledge, and so we'd like a look see.