Murray is known for his eugenics arguments. He's pushing for economic Darwinism. The use of 'DNA' in his article belies his propensities. He uses pseudoscience to sell his brand of politics. Firing salvos for a Trump advisor.
Appreciate the idea behind the article which may have value, but the data types seem ordinal? 1.0-4.0? is that trying to mirror US GPA system. Normalized based on what? p-values are an archaic only useful for MBAs and Med students.
The whole industry is in recession. Those stuck in it just mental masterbate about crap, knowing that automation/ai will destroy their paradigm. In reality it's boring and nothing like the energy and passion in start ups/creative tech.