I think the aspect that is missing for a lot of these hypotheticals is the amount of input we allow the AI to receive.
In the Star Trek model we see the input directly limited to the data in the ship and surrounding visual areas (as far as i'm aware)
In the Wally model we see that the input is limited to a single optic/auditory/ect location.
We have a potential network that input can come from everywhere cameras, phones connected to the internet of everything. I think it really comes down to with how we want to interact with AI and how much input should it have to directly interface with us.
Also it's very hard to know even during deployment how accurate an AI will have a grasp on human want and interaction. A lot of people are worried about the 'non-consenting' information potentially available to the net. Very few people, if any, will ever really be able to address it should an AI be created and deployed.
In the Star Trek model we see the input directly limited to the data in the ship and surrounding visual areas (as far as i'm aware)
In the Wally model we see that the input is limited to a single optic/auditory/ect location.
We have a potential network that input can come from everywhere cameras, phones connected to the internet of everything. I think it really comes down to with how we want to interact with AI and how much input should it have to directly interface with us.
Also it's very hard to know even during deployment how accurate an AI will have a grasp on human want and interaction. A lot of people are worried about the 'non-consenting' information potentially available to the net. Very few people, if any, will ever really be able to address it should an AI be created and deployed.