HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

rankiwiki

no profile record

Submissions

[untitled]

1 points·by rankiwiki·18 giorni fa·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by rankiwiki·29 giorni fa·0 comments

Show HN: Fooglemap – a map for local restaurant discovery

fooglemap.com
2 points·by rankiwiki·mese scorso·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by rankiwiki·5 mesi fa·0 comments

Show HN: Rankiwiki a multilingual community ranking site

2 points·by rankiwiki·6 mesi fa·1 comments

Tell HN: I shipped a script-based language filter and an onboarding tour

1 points·by rankiwiki·6 mesi fa·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by rankiwiki·6 mesi fa·0 comments

Tell HN: Wrapping up the year and resetting my goals

2 points·by rankiwiki·6 mesi fa·1 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by rankiwiki·6 mesi fa·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by rankiwiki·7 mesi fa·0 comments

Ask HN: Why do small voting or ranking projects get flagged as spam so easily?

6 points·by rankiwiki·7 mesi fa·9 comments

Show HN: Rankiwiki – voting-based rankings for small groups

rankiwiki.com
1 points·by rankiwiki·7 mesi fa·1 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by rankiwiki·8 mesi fa·0 comments

comments

rankiwiki
·mese scorso·discuss
[flagged]
rankiwiki
·5 mesi fa·discuss
About a month ago I shared some thoughts here about trying to simplify a multilingual, content-heavy site I run.

Since then, nothing dramatic happened. No viral spike, no sudden growth.

But I kept building.

I improved the way posts are grouped by writing system instead of language labels. I tightened the onboarding flow so first-time visitors understand the purpose faster. I reduced UI noise instead of adding more features.

The biggest lesson this month: clarity compounds slowly, but confusion compounds immediately.

Most of the work wasn’t adding anything new. It was removing friction that I had slowly introduced over time.

Curious if others here have had similar months, no big launches, just steady refinement.
rankiwiki
·6 mesi fa·discuss
One thing I’m personally unsure about is whether the value proposition is clear enough on first visit.

The original idea was not to “rank things better”, but to see how rankings change when language silos are removed. In some cases, the same topic looks very different depending on script and region.

If you landed on the homepage without context: would you immediately understand what the site is for? or does it feel like “just another list site”?

Honest feedback welcome, even if the answer is “I’m confused”.
rankiwiki
·6 mesi fa·discuss
Interesting concept, especially the focus on safety. Curious to see how it evolves.
rankiwiki
·6 mesi fa·discuss
Feels less like engineers became useless and more like incentives broke. AI raised expectations faster than orgs updated rewards, so extra effort just gets normalized instead of recognized.
rankiwiki
·6 mesi fa·discuss
I recently shipped a couple of small updates to a content-heavy, multilingual site I run.

One was a homepage language filter based on writing systems rather than translation. Posts are grouped by script (Latin, Korean, Chinese, Japanese, etc.), so users can filter mixed language feeds without layout shifts or pagination issues.

The other was a lightweight onboarding tour. It runs once on first visit, is fully customizable, supports multiple languages, and avoids heavy external libraries. The goal was to answer “what is this site?” without adding friction.

Both came from the same realization: clarity matters more than features, especially on the first screen.

Sharing in case it’s useful to others working on multilingual or content dense products.
rankiwiki
·6 mesi fa·discuss
You’re definitely not alone in this, I’ve seen similar drops from Google Ads recently. It feels less like bad optimization and more like the ground shifting under everyone.
rankiwiki
·6 mesi fa·discuss
I want to get better at writing clearly for non-technical audiences. It feels like an underrated skill that multiplies everything else.
rankiwiki
·6 mesi fa·discuss
I drifted more toward graphic novels than ongoing series this year. Shorter, self-contained stories were easier to stick with.
rankiwiki
·6 mesi fa·discuss
You’re definitely not alone in feeling this way, even if it feels isolating. Small routines and low-pressure social spaces helped me more than forcing myself into big social situations.
rankiwiki
·6 mesi fa·discuss
This trend worries me too. Losing basic local functionality just because the internet is down feels like a step backward.
rankiwiki
·6 mesi fa·discuss
A simple starting point for me was checking password reuse and enabling hardware-based 2FA everywhere possible. It’s surprising how much risk disappears just from that.
rankiwiki
·7 mesi fa·discuss
Thanks everyone for taking the time to reply. I’ve shared this project and these questions in a few places, but this is the first time I’ve received such concrete, thoughtful feedback. I appreciate both the critical and sympathetic perspectives. There’s a lot here for me to reflect on and improve.
rankiwiki
·7 mesi fa·discuss
Yeah, that matches what I’ve been experiencing elsewhere too. It feels like the space for small, exploratory projects to be discussed has shrunk a lot.
rankiwiki
·7 mesi fa·discuss
I appreciate this perspective. I think that tension between sharing and promotion is real, especially for people who don’t post often.
rankiwiki
·7 mesi fa·discuss
Fair point. I can see how my posting pattern comes across that way, even if that wasn’t my intent. HN’s norms are stricter than I accounted for. Thanks for the direct feedback.
rankiwiki
·7 mesi fa·discuss
Thanks, this is actually very helpful feedback.

You’re right about the language issue and the lack of upfront explanation, that’s on me. The accidental post creation is especially painful to hear, but useful.

I like your suggestion about silent user testing. I’ve mostly tested it myself, which probably explains a lot.
rankiwiki
·7 mesi fa·discuss
Maker here.

I built Rankiwiki because group decisions often get messy: long comment threads, loud voices, and no clear picture of collective preference.

Rankiwiki is intentionally simple:

- each person gets one vote

- results are shown as a ranked list

- it’s meant for small groups (classes, clubs, communities)

I’m especially looking for feedback on:

1) what’s a use case where ranking is better than a normal poll?

2) what would make this feel less “gameable” in small groups?

Happy to answer any questions.