Same. My experience with the “concept” of Wikipedia was very high until I had the “direct experience” of Wikipedia, and I realized that the encyclopedia of the commons may not have planned for me to be in the commons.
This exact issue has derailed our main document store for the past several years. We have written a couple supporting applications specifically to address the fallout from this issue.
This appears to be very interesting. What happens when the site goes offline or they change the underlying content I highlighted? Is there the ability to see the versions as it was when I annotated?
Does this have offline archival ability or link to something that does? I struggle with saving links that are then offline when I use them for supplementary research sometimes months or years later and would like to have something that will download the site as well when I add it to the tool..
Very likely less than 99.5% accuracy based on my testing…
… or …. I guess it’s possible that someone is drugging me several times a day, cloning my SIM card, putting it in another device and flying all over the U.S.
At first glance, this appears that it could have considerable potential. What do you think about changing the name to something unique since it’s so early on? Ethereal -> Wireshark, etc…..
I’ve been part of over 5 501(c)3 and 501(c)6 startups and unless something drastic has changed in the last few years since COVID, it is not that expensive (well under 1k). Consult with someone who does nonprofit creation and they will let you know what 501(c)X that the effort would best be described as and absolutely shouldn’t break the bank.
I think this is awesome too, but I’m at a loss to describe where I could replace already built services. Can you share some perspective on specific things that you see this can do that is amazing?