HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

reyqn

no profile record

comments

reyqn
·4 mesi fa·discuss
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079
reyqn
·5 mesi fa·discuss
Embarrassing bugs are not RCEs. Also the industry should be more mature now, not less. But move fast and break things, I guess...
reyqn
·6 mesi fa·discuss
What stops people designing those automated attacks to run the python script on a phone that is blocked by Google?
reyqn
·7 mesi fa·discuss
I would argue clair obscur is actually a shooter game seeing the variety of op builds
reyqn
·7 mesi fa·discuss
Many potential Chrome users were not users, and then android happened. I'll believe firefox has a shot to become mainstream when they do something similar. Until them, keep your users or alienate them and disappear.
reyqn
·7 mesi fa·discuss
Potential users are not users, and firefox can't be that browser. Actually that browser is brave, and it also doesn't have hundred of millions of users. You can't fight defaults browsers, people don't care.
reyqn
·7 mesi fa·discuss
That's how normal users stay on chrome while your users leave firefox. That's how you get no users at all.
reyqn
·7 mesi fa·discuss
These are the cutting insights I come to HN for.
reyqn
·8 mesi fa·discuss
Care to explain why?
reyqn
·8 mesi fa·discuss
NMT doesn't "contain" tranformers and deep RNNs, it can use them. LLMs use a transformer architecture, not everything using a transformer architecture is an LLM. NMT can actually use an LLM, but that's not the case according to the documentation you linked, they use a parallel dataset to train their models.
reyqn
·8 mesi fa·discuss
And is also not using an LLM. It's neural machine translation.
reyqn
·8 mesi fa·discuss
The built-in translation is not LLM, it's NMT
reyqn
·10 mesi fa·discuss
Maybe he wanted his point to be conveyed easily and used "post-apocaliptic fiction" as a shortcut, but probably knows it's not so trivial. I think people not versed in a particular domain can still have interesting (even if wrong) ideas, that are worth reading and thinking about.
reyqn
·10 mesi fa·discuss
I'm lucky. I'm lucky because I didn't ever have to try hard at anything in my life, and I have a good life.

I was born from two parents that cared about me. Luck

In a country where most people have a decent shot at life. Luck

I'm lazy, but I was granted a body that never failed me, and was pushed by people around me to try stuff. Luck

I'm lazy, but my laziness is somehow useful in this computer driven world. Luck

All this luck compounds, and thanks to the activities I was pushed to do, the schools I was pushed to go to, I was lucky to meet great friends, an amazing girlfriend, and have a cushy job, a nice house in a beautiful place. Luck. Luck. Luck. Luck

I have no ambition, I was never prepared for anything, but all I've had was luck.

That's what you call luck, and a lot of people try to convince themselves everything good that happens to them is because they somehow deserve it. Because they were "ambitious" and "prepared", and an "opportunity" struck at the right time, and obviously they seized it, and everyone that didn't just didn't deserve it as much as them.

Obviously some people weren't as lucky as me, and actually had to work hard, and managed to seize an actual opportunity that wasn't gifted to them. But that's not all luck, only a little part is. And those people are quite rare.
reyqn
·10 mesi fa·discuss
It's crazy how the hardware sector just can't grasp that software is actually important too. Everywhere I've worked at we were just second class citizens, last to get a new hire or any budget, and then it was our fault when the software was subpar. It seems like they think going down to our level will actually sully them.
reyqn
·10 mesi fa·discuss
I think what makes a lot of people talk about it precisely is this:

"This is a 10/10 phishing email."

It's not. But it doesn't mean I wouldn't also fall for it because I was tired/in a hurry or whatever else could let me drop my guard.

Humans are humans.
reyqn
·5 anni fa·discuss
It's not really what the MS devs said though: "I believe what you’re doing is describing something that might be considered an entire doctoral research project in performant terminal emulation"

This seems to mean, nobody has ever done that, it is a research project (a doctorate thesis must be about something that has never been researched before, at least where I live).

This particular problem cannot be a PhD subject, because it has already been researched, solved and done multiple times, by different persons and on different projects.

Someone can use the knowledge already widely available on the internet to grasp what the issue is, and implement a solution in their own project.

Years of experience aren't a PhD. Years of experience can help you understand a thesis, but only if the research doesn't exist yet, can it be considered a doctoral research project.