riemann12·2 anni fa·discussI’ve heard this argument:If RH is unprovable one way or another, then certainly no counterexample can exist to the RH otherwise you could find it and prove the RH to be false.Hence if RH is unprovable, it must be true. I suppose this uses logic outside the logical system that RH operates in.
If RH is unprovable one way or another, then certainly no counterexample can exist to the RH otherwise you could find it and prove the RH to be false.
Hence if RH is unprovable, it must be true. I suppose this uses logic outside the logical system that RH operates in.