I get that you're trying to be helpful. But the way you say things come through as being dismissive about other people's work. They just put in a bunch of work into it; they seem very open to getting feedback and working on it. I'm curious what you're trying to prove by calling it "crappy"?
A friend of mine created a page to show code snippets and comparisons between a few of the plotting libraries available in Python (and R) -- http://pythonplot.com/
DigitalOcean | New York, Cambridge/Boston, Remote | Onsite/Remote | Visa
The Data & Analytics team is looking for Senior Data Engineers. You'd have to be in New York or be willing to relocate (DO provides relocation). Feel free to shoot me an email if you're interested. You can find the email in my profile.
Worth mentioning here, the text summarization engines are pretty much only usable on news articles or text with clean paragraph structure (yes, non-tech literature works too). Popular text summarization tools as they stand now, fails on anything else.
If you're a data scientist or an ML enthusiast, please do engage/start discussions over in DataTau. That'd be splendid!
We've been trying to keep posts there pretty technical there and the community loves it so far. Think of DataTau as a place where you go to learn/share things you've learned from getting your hands dirty with data/Machine Learning/statistics/science!
Nice! I made something similar except it was more about how people are influenced by ideas of people around them and less about violence. link: http://goo.gl/H0Wqxo
Pretty cool! I did something similar when I was learning javascript. I built GoL for a three-state system. Here's the bl.ocks.org link : http://goo.gl/H0Wqxo
EDIT2: Last year Facebook said 4.8% of their MAU was duplicate, misclassified, or spam accounts. That's 51+ million today assuming the percentage has remained constant.
I get that you're trying to be helpful. But the way you say things come through as being dismissive about other people's work. They just put in a bunch of work into it; they seem very open to getting feedback and working on it. I'm curious what you're trying to prove by calling it "crappy"?