By that token, is the harmed party here also immature? Also do you work at GitHub and did he hurt your feelings by... being dead accurate as to several engineering failures?
I mean, focus on whatever you want, but he hasn't done anything Linus Torvalds hasn't done (at least similar enough).
I mean... You could always ChatGPT it yourself, could you not? Your ability to find information around this doesn't appear to be hampered by anything other than your imagination.
I would be curious as to what your prompt ends up being (and the reply obviously) if you choose to do so.
So why would it take off there instead of in a larger city with more resources?
I'm not disagreeing with you completely, but I would like to know more about what other factors you would consider to have been more impactful. I don't know that you really need hippies around to get that kind of 'california capitalist' mentality either tbf.
Try to understand that there is no individual ownership over turns of phrase, and that they tend to shift around over time. Bugs Bunny turned Nimrod from a byword for a competent hunter into an insult.
This is natural and all of your favorite words have or will be subject to it as long as there are humans to communicate with them.
I agree with yowlingcat's point but I see where you are coming from and also agree with you.
The way I see it, it's a bit like putting up a job posting for 'somebody who knows SSH'. While that is a useful skill, it's really not something you can specialize in since it's just a subset within linux/unix/network administration, if that makes sense.
Yeah basically! I thiught it was a bit ridiculous that they would charge for something so easy to make yourself. For example, I have a series of md files with iterated prompts in a folder and start off a human generated prompt to feed into [insert favorite LLM].
an example seed:
"create a prompt for an agent that will help me reduce prompt token usage and speed up results without losing necessary complexity. can you build a prompt that I use to this end?"
After a bunch of recursive prompting:
"Optimize the provided 'Original Prompt' into an 'Optimized Prompt'.
The 'Optimized Prompt' must:
- Be token-efficient.
- Be maximally clear, precise, unambiguous, with direct instructions.
- Be ideal for advanced AI model processing.
- Preserve the 'Original Prompt's' core intent and task.
- Retain 'Original Prompt's' details, nuances, analytical requirements, output formats, and complexity, without oversimplification.
Apply this optimization method:
1. From 'Original Prompt', eliminate: conversational filler, redundancy, pleasantries, self-references.
2. Use: strong, direct action verbs.
3. Be: specific, direct. Replace vague terms with precise equivalents.
4. Clearly state: task, context, constraints, output format. Explicitly define implied formats (e.g., list, JSON, steps).
5. Logically group related instructions.
6. Ensure 'Optimized Prompt' is a direct command."
It's brutishly simple, but part of the (imho self evident) process is editing the prompts as you continue to feed it back in on itself.
> AI is clearly a net negative to humanity in its current form, and almost certainly all future forms.
I'm going to make an equally supported and valid statement here and say AI is clearly a net positive to humanity in its current form, and almost certainly all future forms.
You should consider providing a less hyperbolic point to argue if you are looking to have any kind of productive or healthy discussion on the internet.
Anything's debatable. The question is whether or not what you've chosen to defend is more or less substantial than a wet fart in a hurricane.
Pre-industrial growth that was driven largely by settler colonialism does not make for a useful economic model since we're unlikely to find any new continents any time soon. To say nothing of the horrors inflicted on native populations, but I suspect that's not a group you'd be too sympathetic towards.
I would recommend you stop confusing your own willful ignorance with lack of evidence. You could take a cursory look at the wikipedia page on Australia's response to the GFC as a case study in government doing it's actual job, instead of this fantasy of auto-regulation via free market competition. You can have a bit of both and reap outsized benefits as has been the case for every great to super power sunce the dissolution of the USSR.