Turing team member here. You can also try the demo at the following link which operates at pixel level for images (no meta-data which is how similar systems like search engines work). Another cool thing is that the model does inherent OCR without explicit training or inference set-up for OCR.
https://turing.microsoft.com/bletchley
(Team member of this project)
Just a clarification, both Microsoft and Nvidia have ownership of this model. Here is the Microsoft version of same announcement.
We don't have an exact date, but, we plan to share more details in a later submission. If you want access, please send an email to [turing_ AT _microsoft _DOT_ com]. Remove underscores and spaces.
Thanks for your kind words.
Yes, we would like to next train a language representation model. And our hunch is that probably something which is a mixture of language representation and language generation would be able to get the best of both worlds.
(Similar to the response for another question.)
BERT is a language representation model while Turing-NLG is a language generation model (similar to GPT). They are not directly comparable (they can potentially be massaged to mimic the other, but, not something that we have done yet.)
SQUAD and GLUE are tasks for language representation models -- aka BERT-like. This is a language generation model -- GPT-like. Hence, SQUAD/GLUE test sets are not really applicable. We are reporting on the wikitext and lambada sets that openAI also uses for similar models (numbers are in the blogpost).
Happy to answer any questions.