HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

sharpascents

no profile record

comments

sharpascents
·4 anni fa·discuss
I stand corrected.

We don't know when this first disclaimer was orignially published / added though.

And I would let people make their own decision whether they think her publication is misleading or not:

https://kittiyapawlowski.com/snow-leopard-series

edit: her disclaimer also reads like it was more reactive rather than precautionary: "I never stated my images were not edited anywhere".
sharpascents
·4 anni fa·discuss
Good point on the analysis not linking any original sources.

However, and importantly, she only added the disclaimer after having suffered from the backlash:

Check for yourself:

No statement about 'composites' on this version from 4 days ago:

https://web.archive.org/web/20221127010418/https://kittiyapa...

I am not convinced by her explanation either. It was never clear they were composites.

Again, going to her original publication: https://kittiyapawlowski.com/snow-leopard-series

I find the whole story misleading at best: having the 'composite' (fake) images next to captions explaining that this is a snow leopard at 17,014 ft (5185 meters) is dishonest.

She thought she could get away with it but backtracked a few days later after it got out of hands.