HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

sherburt3

no profile record

comments

sherburt3
·9 giorni fa·discuss
That doesn't appear to be stopping the current administration. That's why I think you should be more concerned about the tools of oppression existing rather than the laws that govern them.
sherburt3
·9 giorni fa·discuss
These tech-bro public resignations are so tedious. Ostensibly he seems fine with the existence of AI mass surveillance and AI powered murderbots but he just never envisioned a scenario where they would get used that wasn't congruent with his politics.
sherburt3
·15 giorni fa·discuss
God punished the Romans by turning them into Italians
sherburt3
·20 giorni fa·discuss
I think the addresses are a big issue. The address space is just stupid big, I don't understand why we need to prepare for every grain of sand on Earth having a WiFi chip in it.

Most people can pick up calculating subnets in their head in ipv4 pretty quickly and ipv4 addresses are easy to memorize on accident. My brain turns to mush as soon as I start seeing hexadecimal characters in addresses.
sherburt3
·20 giorni fa·discuss
40 bits would've bought us a lot of time and would've kicked the can down the road several decades. People from the future would be much better equipped to design a new protocol because they understand their needs better.
sherburt3
·20 giorni fa·discuss
I was saying adding a byte to the address so its a 40 bit address which would be two bytes to the header. Obviously it would still have the same issue where hardware and software would be incompatible and would need to be replaced but the same concepts that worked in IPv4 would work in my fake protocol instead of IPv6 where the network needs to be redesigned from the ground up.

Also IPv6 addresses are ugly
sherburt3
·20 giorni fa·discuss
Literally all we had to do was add a byte to IPv4 and we'd be done but noooo we need to overengineer the next protocol and make it as painful as possible to adopt.
sherburt3
·28 giorni fa·discuss
If someone modified the original dataset and it was discovered they would be held accountable. However if you have a departmental policy of modifying the data for "privacy reasons" and it just so happened to surrepititiously affect some sort of political outcome then ah geez that just a wacky coincidence not any individuals fault.
sherburt3
·28 giorni fa·discuss
So "differential privacy" pretty much sounds like someone gets to modify the results of a census and how it gets modified is entirely up to their discretion.

Seems like something that could be abused to achieve political objectives.
sherburt3
·mese scorso·discuss
Thanks for chiming in Young Sheldon
sherburt3
·2 mesi fa·discuss
[flagged]
sherburt3
·2 mesi fa·discuss
[flagged]
sherburt3
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Whenever I read about some troubling news in the world I always take time to look at my funko pop collection and contemplate the question "What would Spider-man do?"
sherburt3
·3 mesi fa·discuss
I'm sure there's a barely functioning business critical app that runs exclusively on Windows NT in their administration that would beg to differ
sherburt3
·4 mesi fa·discuss
Do you wear a condom while you’re programming too for maximum protection?
sherburt3
·8 mesi fa·discuss
[flagged]
sherburt3
·8 mesi fa·discuss
[flagged]
sherburt3
·9 mesi fa·discuss
What if you just like do normal programming instead?
sherburt3
·9 mesi fa·discuss
Feel free to do your own analysis
sherburt3
·9 mesi fa·discuss
I think you can have empathy for their situation and also recognize the gluttonous amount of self pity in this.