HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

smcnc

no profile record

Submissions

[untitled]

1 points·by smcnc·2 mesi fa·0 comments

comments

smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
One thing I noticed on the CS PhD side of the house is because many researchers don't want others to easily build upon their work (for whatever reasons), they don't often release the source code/data required to quickly validate it. This is a recipe for shortcuts, errors, and even in the worst cases, fraud.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
We’re both #DudesForKamala
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
I was merely responding to replies directed at me. But that is probably good advice. No opinion was ever changed online. :)
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
“Flee and reside in hotels” not equal to relocate and continue mission. The major operational staff at these bases still work there. Support was relocated not fleeing.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
US soldiers get hotels when fleeing? Wtf lol
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
[flagged]
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
[flagged]
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
US blew up C-130s stuck in sand. A few got shot up. Iranians on the ground got the brunt of the bullets, however.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
There’s a difference between occupation (where this wins) and deterrence (where they can’t attack your country). The latter was the primary objective.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Define defeat here. I think everyone in this thread confuses actual defeat with indifference and political risk. If the US military could be defeated so easily America would cease to exist, no? It just loses interest and moves on. Nobody attacks the US because they would lose.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
This is now Vietnam with no boots on the ground or years of war? Wow! Thanks
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
More leverage with less conventional firepower? Objectives of reducing conventional military threats and nuclear weapons seem less now, no?
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Uncertainty.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
> 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Agree with same comment as above.

> This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Cost of insurance for ships did.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Search and rescue. Yes, it takes assets. Correct.
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Insightful
smcnc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
[flagged]