HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

staticautomatic

no profile record

comments

staticautomatic
·18 giorni fa·discuss
How does a $25B offering have $85B in orders?
staticautomatic
·25 giorni fa·discuss
Yep. I sure do.
staticautomatic
·26 giorni fa·discuss
You can’t interview effectively by limiting yourself to questions where the applicant knows what you want them to say.
staticautomatic
·26 giorni fa·discuss
If you're going to have people use AI regularly, it's worth asking so that you can get a sense of their interest/willingness, experience level, and training needs. That said, more specific questions are typically more revealing. Personally I'm fond of "If you could give Claude only 1 instruction, what would it be?"
staticautomatic
·26 giorni fa·discuss
In what way is “How are you using AI?” an objectively bad question?
staticautomatic
·26 giorni fa·discuss
Communes typically fall apart when bad apples join and the commune fails to get rid of them.
staticautomatic
·29 giorni fa·discuss
Biology? Why?
staticautomatic
·mese scorso·discuss
Clean. This comment is the right shape.
staticautomatic
·mese scorso·discuss
Friendly reminder that you don't have to enable PostHog replays at all. I have a site lightly instrumented server-side with the slim bundle, and I'm still gonna double check my account settings but I'm pretty sure it's not even capable of doing the replay telemetry.
staticautomatic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Municipal insurers already do that
staticautomatic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
It also posits that there are only two sides.
staticautomatic
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Doesn't McMaster Carr still use sprites? Is that like the one optimization they managed to get wrong?
staticautomatic
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Is this not often trivially solved with islands?
staticautomatic
·3 mesi fa·discuss
No. Prophet is based on curve-fitting.
staticautomatic
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Guys they're just disclaiming warranties relax
staticautomatic
·4 mesi fa·discuss
That's not how jury selection works. You never have enough peremptory strikes to "dismiss a huge fraction of the jury pool."
staticautomatic
·4 mesi fa·discuss
It’s actually not that uncommon to lose a ton of people for cause in cases that are a good fit for a transfer of venue motion. But of course it does come down to the trial judge. I don’t understand who this “next judge” is that you’re referring to.
staticautomatic
·4 mesi fa·discuss
Not peremptory strikes, but you have unlimited removals for cause (and admittedly a steep appellate hill to climb if they’re unfairly denied)
staticautomatic
·5 mesi fa·discuss
You’re always on your own to collect.
staticautomatic
·5 mesi fa·discuss
I’ll see your Art and raise you Life https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aEdrey6U5dU&pp=ygUSVGVjaGNydW5...