I did make that assumption because it doesn't fucking matter why, those are all still things that should be done. Domestic violence is bad, fortunately we can focus on more than one damn thing.
There aren't that many billionaires. So are you saying they aren't the worst of the billionaire class? That's really the only way I can see the phrase working.
> I mentioned to her that they can’t sell their stock without ceding control
What about changing voting schemes?
> Does it say something about someone’s heart if they aren’t building schools and hospitals the moment they obtain enough wealth to do so comfortably?
I think it says something about their heart if they are able to get that wealthy, with rare exceptions.
Neither are going to happen. He might toss around a bit of money to try and buy a better reputation, but he's still the worlds richest man by standing on the backs of the very people who's kids need better education.
The political chasm is because the democrats keep moving right to try and win over moderate republicans the republicans keep moving into crazy territory.
Moving leftwards is absolutely the best thing the democrats could possibly do. further left policies are popular. Further left policies address the massive amount of voters who don't give a shit because neither party represents anything but corporations.
America could use 50 more senators that were willing to start moving much further left.
Having a good plan and the resources to execute is what works.
I know it sounds like I'm talking about a minor difference, but I think it's a lot bigger than that. You can add more money to a lot of the broken systems in the US. It helps, but it doesn't fix core problems and the systems are still incredibly inefficient.