Not sure why you find that piece of "evidence" particularly damning. Do you know anything about the author? Do you know his methodology? His sources? What makes him credible?
From the database author himself [0]:
> "we have over 10000+ documented people" was the initial comment. Neither boasting nor saying 100% are credible.
I honestly find it both hilarious and disappointing that HN users are skeptical and contrarian about absolutely everything, except when it comes to what the US government and its proxies have to say about China.
From the database author himself [0]:
> "we have over 10000+ documented people" was the initial comment. Neither boasting nor saying 100% are credible.
I honestly find it both hilarious and disappointing that HN users are skeptical and contrarian about absolutely everything, except when it comes to what the US government and its proxies have to say about China.
[0] https://twitter.com/shahitbiz/status/1306554296088096769?s=2...
[1] https://twitter.com/DanielDumbrill/status/130801041951298764...