Great feedback, I'll work on the video ASAP. I intended to immediately create a follow-up video that steps through each component of a newly created decision, got distracted, never circled back.
This is a good nudge to choose the grammatically correct option, thank you.
I originally had "less meetings" before an LLM corrected me into using "fewer meetings". Then when talking about Orgtools to a couple people I heard them say "less meetings" and switched back thinking that sounds slightly more natural (but incorrect).
Not sure what the market is for something like this but it's something I've been thinking a lot about since stepping down as CEO of my previous company.
My goal is two-fold:
1. Help teams make better, faster decisions with all context populating a source-of-truth.
2. Help leaders stay eyes-on, and circumstantially hands-on, without slowing everything down. What I'd hope to be an effective version of "Founder Mode".
If anybody wants to play around with it, here's a link to my staging environment:
I co-founded Ambition (YC W14) and have spent the last 10 years serving as CEO before stepping down in December.
Upon hitting ~50 employees, started to think more about the push/pull between alignment and velocity. How can we maintain effective "founder mode" as we scale?
One of the first things to slow down was decision-making. Who should be involved? In what capacity? Is this worth a meeting? Turns out it's a painful process getting a start-up to even consider, let alone adopt, something like RASCI... even with growing frustration that things are taking too long.
So I decided to try and build decision-making software that might have helped, something that would have introduced incremental process in a more palatable way.
While there's certainly overlap with Slack, Notion, etc... in my head there's still a real need for something like this but I'm curious what you (and the market) think.
Thank you in advance for any thoughts, feedback, tough love.