>I fully respect that you have figured this out (because you're absolutely not wrong), but have you ever considered trying to become a top-tier male?
I don't get anything out of having sex with women I don't like and I generally don't find women to be likeable. Just like most guys I have been looking for love in my 20s just to find out that no such thing exists beyond a mother's love for her children. I look above average and dress above average these days and get a fair amount of unwanted female attention as they apparently love my facial expression of seething contempt for most people.
Coding newsgroups - especially linux related, are famously rude and hostile, but now that IT is one of the major world industries the jewish powers that be push for "muh equality", "muh wimminz coders", "muh minority devs" and "let's make dis a happy space :) !!!!111".
Linus Torvalds telling someone to shut the fuck up:
I'm a recluse myself. Modern society has little to offer to most men that aren't top tier earners, looks etc.
You'll live in some shit tier city because you aren't making enough to move somewhere nice (or can't get a work visa), people around you are aggressive low IQ proles in Europe - always looking to pick fights (see https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1713078/moments-after-photo-of... ), if you aren't an aggressive muscular guy you'll just get some fugly harpy who will "settle" for you. There's just nothing in it for me.
I have been to Japan and the society is fairly autistic. People are polite but want to stay in their own little bubble. You could collapse on the street in Tokyo and nobody would give a shit if you don't block the entrance of a business. In the outskirts of Tokyo people live in bleak housing blocks that already look depressing from far away that make modern condos look like masterpieces.
The society is super hierarchical, with old people being on top and young people earning almost nothing, jobs being hard to come by, guys not getting girlfriends / wifes cause strong independent women don't need no man and socializing with random people outside the internet is highly uncommon as well.
If I was in Japan I would be a recluse as well.
EDIT: Bring on the downvotes. I miss the usenet days where people actually had similar opinions to me and it was still a 99% male space where women were universally hated - long before fuckbook, twatter and young engineered brainwashed by colleges into becoming social justice warriors.
Basically it comes down to her not feeling comfortable being around a majority of whites and asians and she feels that she has to change her whole personality just s others like her more.
She also prefers to be around blacks, preferably black women.
This has little to do with Google though.
Google is rather corporate and thus it's only for people willing to adapt a corporate personality during the day - often in combination with a rather conservative physical appearance.
Cornrows and overly casual probably wouldn't fly too well in the head office, no matter if you're black, white or asian.
I used to work as at Google and it was my worst job ever.
It was not for Google directly though, but via a temp agency for a Google project.
Google rented an office building just for the project with temp agency HR on site and a few Googlers that were mostly in management and supervising things.
Contracts were structured in a way to avoid having to pay benefits and to be able to maximize pressure on the the employee with extremely short notice periods.
The turnover was enormous, almost everyone hated working there and 30-40% of the employees were reminded weekly by HR that they're on probation and will get fired if their performance isn't better next week.
>Of course, creating “good jobs” entails costs. Managed by Q’s workers get an “above market” wage, plus full medical benefits. “They are the same benefits that our programmers and engineers get,” Mr. Rahmanian said, because “we didn’t want to create a company that had a divide between people that worked in headquarters and the others.”
That's just common sense. If you pay the same salary that some outsourcer pays you're looking at a high turnover that will be more of a headache and cost factor than 3-4k extra a year above the average wage for someone in customer support for example (which is a tiny amount compared to engineer salaries anyway).
>Munchery, a dinner delivery service, pays drivers a base wage that exceeds the minimum wage, plus their driving expenses, plus tips. Taken together, it comes out to about $23 an hour in San Francisco, far higher than most other delivery jobs. Those who work more than 30 hours a week also get health and retirement benefits.
I don't know about Munchery and will give them the benefit of a doubt, but usually companies that offer full benefits for 30+ hours (don't they legally have to do this anyway in SF?), they just cut anyone off at 29 hours.
Also the "taken together" "wage" is highly misleading if it includes costs of gas and all the other expenses that one has to pay for a car, in a city where one doesn't even necessarily have to own one.
Basically the whole story is about common sense, as min wage or slightly above contractors obviously don't tend to be very loyal or excited about their work beyond lip service, as pretty much anyone doesn't see this as a long term situation and will just switch to the next best thing whenever possible.
Employment contracts on the other hand come with notice periods, non compete etc. that will make switching jobs a lot more of a hassle and make anyone think twice if they really want to do it.
Memorize the 2000 or so most common words via spaced repetition with Anki or Super Memo using pictures.
Learn the grammar.
Start reading simple books / websites about stuff that interests you, accompanied with a dictionary website, as you'll need to look up a shitload of words.
Once you can read well enough, interact with people via forums or web chats in the language, which will improve your skills further.
If you want to sound like a native you'll need lots of speaking practice until your brain adapts.
Some people will sound like Arnold Schwarzenegger for life though.
The older I get, the more merit I see in a back to nature lifestyle, but that's a personal choice and killing people to stop technological progress is delusional.
Welcome to NY, where everybody outside of Brooklyn is a high achiever who thinks it's necessary to fill his life with as much work as possible, as otherwise someone else might get his job / he might miss out on a promotion.
I'm living in a developing country and I'm glad online grocery delivery exists.
The nearest supermarket is 30min walk away, taking a cab would cost money and time too (I don't have a car) and the nearer wet market (about 15min walk away) is just a huge mess with everybody looking unhappy, prices needing haggling and quality being much lower.
My quality of living has gone up a lot since then and I'm saving a lot of time as well.
You can demand all you want, but if there are no unions or legislations to back your demands, nothing is ever going to happen.
Unions, which are most widely found in western Europe accomplish little these days (the negotiated wages for call center workers are barely livable for example).
If you're a skilled developer, you can work your way to freelancer / self employed consultant or join one of the companies that offers part time work / 4 day work week (there was a recent article about one in Portland that only does 4 day work weeks).
If you're unskilled, you'll always be fucked to varying degrees, as such is life unfortunately.
Also it's hard to take an article seriously when it cites Marx, whose theories obviously don't work in the real world, as humans are competitive to varying degrees by nature.
It's kinda weird to suck up to Apple by claiming it's a great strategy upfront without there being any proven sales success.
I don't think there is much of a demand for smart watches and the luxury edition will make many people think if they want to support a company that offers outrageously priced products along with normal priced products, as both hipsters that can easily afford apple products and wealthy people might not vibe with a dual strategy like this.
Average joe doesn't read wired or the new york times and if he has heard about any of the leaks, he probably thinks "I have nothing to hide so no big deal - USA number one!".
Cinema chains probably don't want to piss off big gov either and the owners are usually politically involved too.
If a random guy collapses on the street nobody would care.