I always thought that biology delineates these organisms from their relationship?
They are still clearly seperate organisms, as a human does not require a particular bacterial cell, only that at least one is present in its proper place (the same as all the other cells in the human body). Thus, the "human organism" is an emergent organism from many cells, bacterial or not, acting and interacting non-deterministically. The bacterial cell by its existence allows for the existence of the larger organism.
A baby relies on adults to survive as well, but it is not biologically claimed that they are the same organism as the adults they rely on for survival.
We all require consumption of living and dead cells to survive as well. We do not claim organic-unification with these other organisms.
It is not ammonia powered. It is hydrogen powered. The hydrogen is pulled from the ammonia and used in the fuel cell. Doesn't the hydrogen in the ammonia originally come from coal or gas?
So, is this more of a test for using ammonia as an intermediary storage for hydrogen fuel? Not the headline but that seems way more of a revolutionary concept. That could make the hydrogen economy competitive with gasoline?
They are still clearly seperate organisms, as a human does not require a particular bacterial cell, only that at least one is present in its proper place (the same as all the other cells in the human body). Thus, the "human organism" is an emergent organism from many cells, bacterial or not, acting and interacting non-deterministically. The bacterial cell by its existence allows for the existence of the larger organism.
A baby relies on adults to survive as well, but it is not biologically claimed that they are the same organism as the adults they rely on for survival.
We all require consumption of living and dead cells to survive as well. We do not claim organic-unification with these other organisms.