The point of the argument is that meaning emerges in conversation. A session between human and AI is a conversation.
Current AI storage paradigms offer lateral memory across the time axis. What exists around me?
A bit branch is longitudinal memory across the time axis. What exists behind me?
Persist type checked decision trees within it. Your git history just became a tamper-proof, reproducible O(1) decision tree. Execution becomes a tree walk.
Seriously, if you're even the slightest bit curious you should watch the talk, I'm very confident that you'll find impressive what the BEAM brings to the table.
Rust seems to be a good choice considering their initial reasoning behind choosing OCaml. It offers static typing with support for sum types and is reasonably fast, while certainly providing more in terms of libraries.
Current AI storage paradigms offer lateral memory across the time axis. What exists around me?
A bit branch is longitudinal memory across the time axis. What exists behind me?
Persist type checked decision trees within it. Your git history just became a tamper-proof, reproducible O(1) decision tree. Execution becomes a tree walk.
It works. And it's not production ready yet.