HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

xunn0026

no profile record

comments

xunn0026
·4 anni fa·discuss
I see it the other way around. The "movement" does not exist without RMS.

FSF itself is pretty woke nowadays so they have diluted and taken their mission in another direction.

As for the RMS attacks, he did the heresy of thinking out loud on a private mailing list which do-gooders promptly leaked and framed.

Your whole question is silly. He's not 'recuperated' since there's no authority to decide this. It's kinda hard when you replace institutions for woke mobs.
xunn0026
·4 anni fa·discuss
They have like 100 people in Prague, another 100 in Munich and then 1000 in Russia. Safe to say they are a Russian company with an EU "presence" for tax purposes.

It's amazing how much people will close an eye if they like the product!

JetBrains should be boycotted too.
xunn0026
·4 anni fa·discuss
The article is a bit embarrassing to be honest. And framing the thing to remember it forever?! Move on, person, move on.

I would kinda not want to deal with such an attitude as an employee or as a partner. You are not Steve Jobs man!

Though, not many companies know warranty. Only Amazon and sometimes Apple gets it right. Sometimes!
xunn0026
·5 anni fa·discuss
Assuming humans are somewhat rational it must produce something! At its worse interpretation it could be a casino.

Humanity does a whole lot of wasteful things. Should we ban music, too? Parks perhaps? Switch to plain clothing?

In other words, who are you to decide what's wasteful and what should be banned?

I would more consider the ad industry to fit this definition. Yet I saw no computation how much energy and human brains it is wasting.
xunn0026
·5 anni fa·discuss
xunn0026
·5 anni fa·discuss
It's not a different issue. You used academic papers as the standard we could use for open source and it's provably worse.

Even copyright... isn't Elsevier a major copyright holder for all academic papers and thus causing all sorts of problems. It's not like it's all kumbaya out there. The academic world is much worse than GPL and open source on multiple dimensions.
xunn0026
·5 anni fa·discuss
Have you heard of... patents? Why is an idea written on paper so valuable? Why can't people just use it (or, as it often happens, independently rediscover it) and just cite the patent if recognition is required?

As for scientific research, most of the software behind scientific paper is basically closed source. Which is another reason why there's a whole reproducibility problem with science papers: it's quite possible many papers are just bad interpretation of data due to bad software.

Also note how much software / research / data is proprietary. How can one quote that?

I wouldn't mind using only BSD in the future if I get to read the Apple iOS source code on GitHub.
xunn0026
·5 anni fa·discuss
> he was bullied into using the GPL and not the BSD license.

No he was not. He did believe it was a good pick but in retrospect it wasn't.

He was not 'bullied'.

The nerve...
xunn0026
·5 anni fa·discuss
Because if it's somebody that has to push boundaries it's not the plebs it's trillion dollar companies.
xunn0026
·5 anni fa·discuss
Not really. Back when free software was strong, it would have been a good thing for society since Microsoft was selling software in boxes on actual store shelves.

Now 'the edge' is already mostly open source. All the lock-in and value has moved into either infrastructure or in software you don't even get to touch since it runs in the Cloud and you just provide IO to it.