HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

yazzku

no profile record

comments

yazzku
·2 anni fa·discuss
And Hollywood.
yazzku
·2 anni fa·discuss
Unlike in the US?
yazzku
·2 anni fa·discuss
The guy at 2:45 in the video got it right.
yazzku
·2 anni fa·discuss
Here is what I dictate: this is fucking stupid and I'm tired of seeing this nonsense parroted.

Working on your own engine gives you a level of understanding that cannot otherwise be obtained. It's like writing your own OS. This is very much a worthwhile endeavour. People should be encouraged to write their own crap, even if they don't end up using it on the job or whatever (whoever the fuck said this was the only metric for deciding what to work on?) because of the level of insight it provides.

Generic engines like UE5 and Unity break down both in terms of functionality and performance the moment you do something they are not intended to do. They are also an overkill for a project of the scale shared here. From an engineering perspective, it's absolutely ridiculous to use an engine for this project.

So please stop parroting this nonsense. Use your goddamn brain to form opinions. There isn't an off-the-shelf engine for that.
yazzku
·2 anni fa·discuss
Look at the memory consumption diagram on page 6. It looks like you're basically getting the same running time for less memory usage.
yazzku
·2 anni fa·discuss
[flagged]
yazzku
·2 anni fa·discuss
Good point against the EEE case above, but the models are not open source per the OSI definition that everyone understands. That part is part of their marketing playbook. Licenses are almost always non-commercial use, which makes them not-open. You could say it's "open model", but that's a useless term since the arch is not a secret, but rather the training data that went into it, which is not open.
yazzku
·2 anni fa·discuss
These are records from 2022. The hack wasn't carried out the second the calls were made. You really need to keep the records that long to do your billing? That's absurd.
yazzku
·2 anni fa·discuss
> There's no federal law requiring AT&T to hold onto this data.

This is false? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2703 https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/05/22/how-long-cel...
yazzku
·2 anni fa·discuss
It's like the mom and pop shop around the corner.
yazzku
·3 anni fa·discuss
Except that this Community Edition does not require payment up to a certain revenue threshold.
yazzku
·3 anni fa·discuss
This kind of email+phone registration was common in the 90s and earlier. Oh, wait, it's 2023.
yazzku
·3 anni fa·discuss
They're gucci, send them to both.
yazzku
·3 anni fa·discuss
> In addition, they protect individuals’ privacy and the required equipment can be bought at a reasonable price.

To argue that this protects people's privacy (versus cameras in public spaces) is certainly a very odd take.

I'd be more curious to know what are legitimate use cases of this and who funded the research.
yazzku
·4 anni fa·discuss
Good points. Still, what Apple is doing here is a clear abuse of its position.
yazzku
·4 anni fa·discuss
Except that this isn't an alliance, and the point of the complaint is that they market themselves as pro-privacy when they are anything but.
yazzku
·4 anni fa·discuss
'Deeply suspicious' is an understatement. These corporations don't have your back, and if something benefits the user, it's only as a side effect. Sadly, many still buy into the messaging, which must be hard to avoid when Apple's marketing has always been around making you feel like the kool kid in the block. Anybody who has ever believed Apple's pro-privacy scam is living in a fairy tale.
yazzku
·4 anni fa·discuss
I don't get where people get that 'Apple didn't do ads'. I'm not even an iOS user and I know that much. Must be drinking unreal levels of kool-aid.
yazzku
·4 anni fa·discuss
You've pretty much defined the anti-trust case in your own sentence.

Microsoft did not prevent other browsers from being installed; it just shipped IE by default and made it annoying af to uninstall.