Zuckerberg's cheat sheet at senate hearing(news.vice.com)
news.vice.com
Zuckerberg's cheat sheet at senate hearing
https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/ywxqeg/zuckerbergs-cheat-sheet-accidentally-made-public-at-senate-hearing-on-privacy
15 コメント
I think these kind of "piling on" articles do a real disservice, because they distract from the significant, valid privacy concerns about Facebook. I mean, come on, calling it a "cheat sheet"? If you were giving testimony to the US Senate in a highly anticipated hearing, don't you think you would prepare? Were you hoping he'd just wing it?
> I mean, come on, calling it a "cheat sheet"?
Maybe that's me not being a native speaker, but "cheat sheet" to me does not have the negative connotation that you imply. I agree with you that preparing notes for such an occasion is appropriate, but a cursory reading of the article does not show anything that calls Zuckerberg out for bringing notes.
Maybe that's me not being a native speaker, but "cheat sheet" to me does not have the negative connotation that you imply. I agree with you that preparing notes for such an occasion is appropriate, but a cursory reading of the article does not show anything that calls Zuckerberg out for bringing notes.
Regardless of what it's called, it does provide an insight into what Facebook (which seems to mean Mark Zuckerberg) is thinking or has been advised to use in public. Certain points may not have been used in the hearing, and may have never been known without this "leak" (for lack of imagination to think of a better word).
They are commonly called cheat sheets.
> His notes also referred to the fact that only three percent of Facebook employees are African American and five percent Hispanic.
What was the point of this note? To point out how facebook needs to work harder on their diversity culture?
What was the point of this note? To point out how facebook needs to work harder on their diversity culture?
I assume so if someone asked about diversity he would have accurate numbers.
Did he have a choice to opt out of that hearing?
Yes and he was not under oauth.
> [...] at the same time, information he willingly revealed by not actively covering it.
Everything in that cheat sheet raises a lot of 'valid points' and he probably knew not all of it would be discussed.
I'm leaning towards the fact that he's a smart cookie, and that he really wouldn't be opposed to it being photographed.
Everything in that cheat sheet raises a lot of 'valid points' and he probably knew not all of it would be discussed.
I'm leaning towards the fact that he's a smart cookie, and that he really wouldn't be opposed to it being photographed.
Looks like this post was buried... currently top on http://hckrnews.com/ but completely missing from the front page (https://news.ycombinator.com/).
Users flagged it. Perhaps they felt it didn't add enough to the main story, which has been on the front page for hours (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16803775).
[deleted]
From his notes:
> GDPR (Don’t say we already do what GDPR requires)
I was hoping someone would bring up whether they’d be applying those rules globally, not just in the EU. I missed the end of the testimony but for the majority that I listened to, I don’t recall such a commitment.
> GDPR (Don’t say we already do what GDPR requires)
I was hoping someone would bring up whether they’d be applying those rules globally, not just in the EU. I missed the end of the testimony but for the majority that I listened to, I don’t recall such a commitment.
Inaccuracy in a Senate Judiciary Committee isn't fun. Cheat sheet seems smart.
Quality writing.