Sarcasm Analysis Using Conversation Context(arxiv.org)
arxiv.org
Sarcasm Analysis Using Conversation Context
https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.07531
23 コメント
"Internet Argument Corpus (IAC) is a publicly
available corpus of online forum conversations on a range of social and political topics, from
gun control debates, marijuana legalization, climate change, evolution, to name a few (Walker
et al. 2012). The corpus comes with annotations of different types of social language categories
such as agreement/disagreement (between a pair of online posts), nastiness, and sarcasm. There
are different version of IAC and we use a specific subset of IAC in this research. Oraby et al.
(2016) have introduced Sarcasm Corpus V2, a subset of the Internet Argument Corpus V2, which
contain 9,400 posts labeled as sarcastic or non-sarcastic (balanced dataset)."
I wonder if there's a corpus labelling comments and posts based on the context of, "/s". Because labelling a comment as sarcastic is a great indicator the poster understands how sarcasm works.
A sarcasm detector. That's a real useful invention.
/s
[deleted]
Yes, if we ever want our digital assistants to understand language.
Joking aside, TTS engines could benefit from that.
Even though I can see how a false positive would make a great joke out of a serious text.
Even though I can see how a false positive would make a great joke out of a serious text.
This is the perfect response. I assume you're being sarcastic, but I can't tell for certain. Even most humans have trouble detecting sarcasm in print - would a sarcasm detector?
Since sarcasm is the biggest weakness of sentiment analysis, I don't have much faith that sentiment analysis tools will produce truthful results when aimed at social media.
Since sarcasm is the biggest weakness of sentiment analysis, I don't have much faith that sentiment analysis tools will produce truthful results when aimed at social media.
"I assume you're being sarcastic, but I can't tell for certain"
What if the person you're responding to (for the sake of argument) really doesn't know?
I mean, it can take some time to find out if an invention is truly useful.
So if we point it at that statement and demand a verdict, it's sort of an undecidable problem.
What if the person you're responding to (for the sake of argument) really doesn't know?
I mean, it can take some time to find out if an invention is truly useful.
So if we point it at that statement and demand a verdict, it's sort of an undecidable problem.
This is the perfect response. I assume you're being sarcastic, but I can't tell for certain.
No, it is simply a good response. I'm British (and have special skills) and can inform you that satherx is either rather obviously sarcastic or a lemon.
No, it is simply a good response. I'm British (and have special skills) and can inform you that satherx is either rather obviously sarcastic or a lemon.
Sadly there is not enough “conversation context” in your comment to use as a test in this analyzer.
Who is going to write the app? It is sorely needed.
If this becomes an app, I'll buy it
Finally, visitors from Betelgeuse no longer have to rely on a human interpreter.
[deleted]
Please use it to analyze this thread :)
Lets aim it at the LKML. ;)
sucking all the fun out of comment sections.