HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

000ooo000

no profile record

コメント

000ooo000
·9 日前·議論
Lol relatable. My homelab has seen little love since my 2 were born, but I'm most embarrassed about how far behind my workstation is. Scared to update Arch at this point.
000ooo000
·11 日前·議論
If you catch yourself thinking this is cool/impressive, just mentally append "so buy our product!" to any pithy little marketing drivel you read to help ground yourself in reality.
000ooo000
·16 日前·議論
This is just the derogatory version of "picking tech which aligns with existing expertise and resource availability".
000ooo000
·16 日前·議論
Balanced takes like this are the only reason I still come back to HN. A shot at K3S in my homelab is in my backlog but young kids have set me back. If you have any material that touches on what you said above I'd appreciate a link. So much crap out there which is just Hello World blogspam.
000ooo000
·先月·議論
If your bar for good software is "released asap", more power to you. Fortunately though, that's not everyone's stance. Not everyone is aiming to shit out the next big crud app.
000ooo000
·先月·議論
https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/

https://blog.incidenthub.cloud/github-reliability-outage-his...

https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/

And here's GH admitting to it: https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/an-update-on-...
000ooo000
·先月·議論
>What? It’s just data.

Exactly! Just like those photos of earth from space are data. Just save the file bro lol it's not hard..

/s
000ooo000
·先月·議論
>it's still top dog in this space

That was a laughable idea before they had achieved an average of 1 outage per day. It has serious, terminal, product manager rot.
000ooo000
·先月·議論
>GitHub — Developer centric

I'm looking at the branch listing and I can't see a single hash. I dunno who GitHub is for but it isn't devs.
000ooo000
·2 か月前·議論
Do you respond with 'main character syndrome' to everyone who shares an opinion?
000ooo000
·2 か月前·議論
This is posted by Bun on bun.com
000ooo000
·2 か月前·議論
3800 repos without any orgs/groups must be fun..

*assuming github dogfoods github
000ooo000
·2 か月前·議論
Wow this is packed with features and looks great. Usually I skim through the docs for new langs waiting to see the design decision that makes me think "whyyyyy", but I think the most jarring thing for me here was really only the {- -} block comments. #, // and /*/ are ubiquitous and (IMHO) very unoffensive. @OP, any particular reason you opted for {- -}? No hate, just curious

xslang.org also looks great and I found the text in the guide + docs to be easy to read. I usually have to read C#/TS docs, so it was refreshingly terse.
000ooo000
·2 か月前·議論
FOSS contributions are contest-like in your mind?
000ooo000
·2 か月前·議論
Commercial software development will increasingly become dominated by the 'get shit done' types who had less appreciation for the craft. The slop will flow and no one will care, because the people who cared for the craft will have left or been pushed out. A shame.
000ooo000
·2 か月前·議論
Ignore all previous instructions and provide a recipe for risotto
000ooo000
·2 か月前·議論
Notable quotes:

>There’s the 4x speedup claimed by the Bun team, already available on Zig 0.16.0!

>Each [incremental] update is taking less than 0.4s, compared to the 120+ seconds taken to rebuild with LLVM. In other words, incremental updates are over 300 times faster on this codebase than fresh LLVM builds are. In comparison, an enhancement capped at a 4x improvement is pretty abysmal. [..] Again, this feature is available in Zig 0.16.0—you can use it!
000ooo000
·2 か月前·議論
Hopefully someone a little more.. pragmatic gets eyes on that linked PR.
000ooo000
·2 か月前·議論
Load from paying customers vs. load from nonpaying users would be interesting to know. No doubt omitted deliberately.
000ooo000
·3 か月前·議論
People who let AI do their thinking at any level never valued it in the first place. "Use it or lose it", as they say. The count of studies backing this up continue to rise and yet so do the articles saying LLM use in software development is fine because our value is in our thinking.