HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

6thbit

686 カルマ登録 6 年前

投稿

JPMorgan is ditching proxy advisors and turning to AI for shareholder votes

businessinsider.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 6thbit·6 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

6thbit
·一昨日·議論
Likely doesn’t make sense, at least not immediate/mid term. They don’t have to aim for number one though, just for enough cash flow and growth.
6thbit
·一昨日·議論
Can it delegate to just one agent at a time or can it spawn multiple subagents for different tasks?
6thbit
·一昨日·議論
The new architecture makes sense, it seems many of the remaining problems like noise and interruptions are at the sound processing and integration level rather than at an architectural or model level now which makes for an exciting new era.
6thbit
·6 日前·議論
Thank you for taking the time to answer, I rest assured in the fine grind of the astrophysics wheel now.

All those screwup stories are amazing to know about! really help with staying humble and trusting the (scientific) process.
6thbit
·7 日前·議論
That’s a beautiful article showcasing our predicament in having access to more information about the universe. Now i have to be the one to ask the dumb defensive question:

what makes us so certain that we can trust what we see on James Webb? Can we definitely discard a measurement problem?
6thbit
·8 日前·議論
They really dropped the ball on this one.

A frontier lab releasing the most advanced model causes them to lose customers was not on my AI bingo card.
6thbit
·11 日前·議論
Is it out of character for the EU to push a half baked solution out that covers most but a tiny fraction of the population only to get sued later on and rule against its own idea?
6thbit
·11 日前·議論
This is nicely put together, it does make sense that lsps help more as complexity grows because makes navigation across symbols easier.

I hope someone with a large budget can reproduce these with latest Opus/gpt.

My gut feeling is that higher reasoning models tend to use grep more effectively. But intuitively lsp should still win there.
6thbit
·12 日前·議論
Isn’t it subjective what “substantially” may mean to them.

If you use ai tools not for full generation of a song but perhaps a bass track would they allow monetizing?
6thbit
·12 日前·議論
Likely your expectations are mismatched because this is just data and not an analysis.
6thbit
·14 日前·議論
I always struggled with my lack of intuition vs that of my peers that had had a more comprehensive ‘math upbringing’.

Is direct experience and struggle really the only driver for developing intuition?
6thbit
·14 日前·議論
They have many that sometimes act like ones
6thbit
·15 日前·議論
At this point can Apple profit from selling any contracts they have with TSMC?

If they make a deal with say google to delay their own chips, could they profit more than by selling their production?

Demand is so crazy idk if this would begin to make sense
6thbit
·15 日前·議論
They do stand in front of a great opportunity that would also benefit consumers, which seems rare in the llm era.

If people can get opus4.6/gpt5.5-like models locally, labs could raise their prices and sell token speed, better reasoning, mobile-focused improvements, you name it.

Not all consumers are power users and many will be happy to pay for flexibility.
6thbit
·25 日前·議論
This is vastly different than SoC. This is an in-person full time year evangelizing Anthropics business.
6thbit
·25 日前·議論
This lands with religious undertones for me, as it sounds like a missionary deployment program, albeit with a paid salary.
6thbit
·26 日前·議論
> has perfect alignment between talent and mission and business.

Do they have it or do they just sell it?
6thbit
·先月·議論
Would it be a costly process for Anthropic to re-tune those guardrails? Like, re-training sort of cost? or like coding session sort of cost?
6thbit
·2 か月前·議論
but of course! why wouldn't you encourage bot accounts listening every kind of artist to scalp tickets?

look at the monthly active users chart after this deal! promoted.
6thbit
·2 か月前·議論
If you make open source used by any of this companies for this network, would you also characterize it as actively enabling this?

If your retirement fund owns stocks of the s&p 500, does that make you an enabler?

Are there really ways out?