833

no profile record

·3 か月前·議論

That is incredible rewriting of history.

·3 か月前·議論

Not sure why it's always a binary: either give us $1M or we shut down.

Vast majority of products and services can continue on or near zero, with slow or zero velocity.

Really, you can't fire half the team if you have to and keep operating?

1.75M MAU requires very small infrastructure.

833

·6 か月前·議論

> The Guardian was able to create short videos of people stripping to bikinis from photographs of fully clothed, real women. It was also possible to post this adult content on to X’s public platform

Well don't.

833

·6 か月前·議論

This will push CPMs down, and therefore companies will make up for the lower earnings-per-ad by showing more ads.

You can rearrange the deck chairs, sure, but more ads might be more annoying than fewer longer ones.

833

·8 か月前·議論

> Both the possession and publication of such material will be a criminal offence, under amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill currently going through Parliament.

> The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said the change would make choking in pornography a "priority offence" under the Online Safety Act, *putting it on the same level as child sexual abuse material and terrorism content.*

833

·9 か月前·議論

Ofcom said this four days ago:

> "Services who choose to restrict access rather than protect UK users remain on our watchlist"

How does withdrawing service from UK users not "protect UK users"? How does age verifying UK IPs provide more protection than withdrawing the service entirely?

It is about power and control, and nothing else.

833

·9 か月前·議論

Blocking UK users from your service does not put you out of scope of OSA, according to Ofcom.

4 days ago:

> "Services who choose to restrict access rather than protect UK users remain on our watchlist "

833

·10 か月前·議論

Not if you sort by recency or likes.

コメント