HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

ATechGuy

no profile record

投稿

Ask HN: The new wave of AI agent sandboxes?

12 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·4 か月前·5 コメント

Ask HN: The new wave of AI agent sandboxes?

3 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·4 か月前·0 コメント

Ask HN: Is anyone tracking AI traffic to their site? Should we care?

2 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·5 か月前·2 コメント

Ask HN: Why) are you using AI to browse the web?

2 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·5 か月前·4 コメント

Ask HN: (Why) are you using AI to browse the web?

1 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·5 か月前·2 コメント

Google Chrome ships WebMCP, turning every website into a tool for AI agents

venturebeat.com
9 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·5 か月前·2 コメント

Ask HN: If agentic AI is the future, why is every startup shipping a dashboard?

1 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·5 か月前·8 コメント

In 2024, 51% of online activity came from bots

euractiv.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·5 か月前·0 コメント

Ask HN: Have your views about AI / LLMs changed? What triggered it?

4 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·6 か月前·1 コメント

Ask HN: Why are so many rolling out their own AI/LLM agent sandboxing solution?

32 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·6 か月前·18 コメント

Ask HN: Do you agree with Groq founder that more compute will improve GenAI

3 ポイント·投稿者 ATechGuy·9 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

ATechGuy
·4 か月前·議論
This is very useful. Thanks for sharing!
ATechGuy
·4 か月前·議論
+1
ATechGuy
·4 か月前·議論
You built https://github.com/FootprintAI/Containarium for this purpose?
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
TBH, this looks like an LLM-assisted response.
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
+1. It is confusing.
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
And how are you going to define what ocaps/flows are needed when agent behavior is not defined?
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
Interesting. I'd appreciate an example. Thanks!
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
Would love to see performance numbers with nested virtualization, particularly that of IO-bound workloads.
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
> a website can expose functions like searchProducts(query, filters) or orderPrints(copies, page_size) with full parameter schemas

How would this not create backend load and abuse?
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
That's a good start I'd say, but I agree with you that detection is not trivial. I wonder if there's enough value in distinguishing between AI agents (with full browser) and humans. What use cases would it enable?
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
Yes, but how can you tell if it was an agent with full browser?
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
Thanks for your insights!

QQ: does uxwizz also show AI agents visiting websites? have you seen traffic from AI agents?
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
I agree. However, how to define these permissions when agent behavior is undefined?
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
I understand the concern. However, you can customize the profile (e.g., allowlist) to only allow network access to required domains. Also, looks like your sandboxing solution is Docker based, which uses VMs on a Mac machine, but will not use VMs on a Linux machine (weak security).
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
That's right. But they (E2B) rely on the underneath Cloud infra to achieve high scalability. Personally, I'm still not sure about the value they add on top of Cloud hosted VMs. GCP/AWS already offer huge discounts to startups, which should be enough for VM-based sandboxing of agents in the MVP phase.
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
To the commenters here: thanks for correcting me! So AWS is losing AI sandboxing market to GCP due to high cold start times of EC2...very interesting!
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
You can customize curr_dir_access_profile.sb to block access to network/fs/etc. Why is this not enough?
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
sandbox-exec -f curr_dir_access_profile.sb markdownlint
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
Curious to know what made you DIY this?
ATechGuy
·5 か月前·議論
These are all wrappers around VMs. You could DIY these easily by using EC2/serverless/GCP SDKs.