HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

CarrieLab

no profile record

投稿

Introduction to Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback

surgehq.ai
1 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·3 年前·0 コメント

The Expanding Moral Cinematic Universe

lesswrong.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

Netflix's Ad-Supported Plan Reportedly Won’t Allow Downloads for Offline Viewing

variety.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

The mega merger killed Batgirl

theverge.com
8 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

Playing video games has no effect on wellbeing, study finds

theguardian.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

Most Americans think NASA’s $10B space telescope is a good investment

theverge.com
8 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

EU will require all new cars to have speeding prevention technology by 2024

gagadget.com
5 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

‘An Invisible Cage’: How China Is Policing the Future

nytimes.com
12 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·2 コメント

Major retailers creating “face prints” of their customers

smh.com.au
7 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

Remote workers may soon be able to live and work tax-free in Bali

fortune.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

Netflix's plan to charge people for sharing passwords is already a mess

businessinsider.com
6 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

Is Elon right? We labeled 500 Twitter users to measure the amount of Spam

surgehq.ai
7 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·5 コメント

Google Unveils 4th-Gen TPU Chips for Faster Machine Learning

tomshardware.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

Elon Musk suggests charging govs and corps a ‘slight cost’ to use Twitter

theverge.com
6 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

Artificial Intelligence and Chemical and Biological Weapons

lawfareblog.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

Writing a Super Bowl Worthy Commercial with GPT-3

surgehq.ai
9 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

Follow the science? If only it were so easy

nytimes.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·0 コメント

An Analysis of Omicron Tweets: 30% Are Skeptical of the Medical Establishment

surgehq.ai
10 ポイント·投稿者 CarrieLab·4 年前·2 コメント

コメント

CarrieLab
·3 年前·議論
Interesting. I wonder how far we can push the "AI-generated UI" pattern with today's models. Is GPT 3.5 good enough for or will we need GPT 4, and if so, will it be fast enough (I assume yes, eventually)?
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
I'm a PM at a human data company (https://www.surgehq.ai) that helps the large language model companies ensure their models are safe (we're the “clever prompt engineers” who helped Redwood assess their model performance).

We actually just published a blog today that includes our perspective on building “AI red teams” and best practices for AI alignment/safety: https://www.surgehq.ai/blog/ai-red-teams-for-adversarial-tra...
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
Agreed
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
Operational overhead and increased liability for lawsuits, I imagine.
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
Think this just shows you truly important SEO is (to media companies). It's probably easily worth the trouble for them if there are SEO gains.
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
ty!
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
Ah thank you!
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
How do you use it to bookmark?
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
Definitely not a surprising result. Though I don't think the article is claiming it is a surprise.
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
I appreciate that he's drawing clear lines (aside from the generically "severe" consequences promised in response to Russia using nukes, which seems like sensible strategic ambiguity). Have to wonder what the game plan is if Russia does indeed use nuclear weapons. All options seems terrible.
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
For ipad, reading only (no social media, slack, etc).
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
Breitbart.com on HN! That's new.
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
Oh I think your high school pop music theory is spot on. I grew up in the emo era, can actively laugh at the music/fashion now... and still love it more than anything :)
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
Have you seen this post / these examples? It touches on some what of you are talking about in terms of style transfer.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/r99tazGiLgzqFX7ka/playing-wi...
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
> I don't think you'll have many takers here suggesting that things were magically better 40 years ago.

Ha, fair point. I must not realize how old I am, because I was attempting to reference the music of the 1960s and 70s, not 1982, which I agree is not many people's idea of the golden year for music ("Come On Eileen" notwithstanding).

> Sophisticated tools are a bit of a trap. People tend to create in ways that their tools make easier.

No doubt. Ableton, logic, and protools have drastically altered the norms of what modern music is "supposed" to sound like (ie tuned vocals, quantized drums etc). I do wonder what the next generation of music tech will bring.
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
My intuition is that humans will continue to make art that takes advantage of technological advances, just like they always have.

The modern process of producing music would basically be unrecognizable to anyone 40 years ago — it's completely intertwined with technology, and far more automated. Yet music is as important as ever, and amazing music is being made (will politely side-step the pitfall of debating whether music was better 40 years ago!)

So I'm excited to see how visual artists incorporate tools like Dall-E into their artistic process.
CarrieLab
·4 年前·議論
DALL-E 2 is a true "holy shit" moment for me. It's actually hard to believe it's real.