HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

EternalFury

no profile record

コメント

EternalFury
·3 か月前·議論
Public education is important. Without it, it’s harder to stay above average. But there are those who say “it is not my duty to fund the education of anyone else.” Hence, here we are.
EternalFury
·3 か月前·議論
Yes, it’s contradictory to some degree. On purpose. That’s part of living it.

My “advice” is also US-centric, where I have observed time and again what truly leads to one getting their fair share.

Freelancing is a way to achieve this.
EternalFury
·3 か月前·議論
My advice is: Don’t let someone else control your life. Switch occupation every 2 years, even if you find a great environment. Don’t chase, for what you need must come to you. Understand no one can give you the answers you seek; you have to live it.
EternalFury
·3 か月前·議論
If somehow recovering the capex expenditure is not counted, if somehow the cost of developing future models is not counted, then yes, inference costs of current leading models allow a profit.

But those things are tied together.

Even xAI, that now has a reasonably competitive model, is struggling to achieve PMF. Meta is in shambles because their models have underperformed for years now.
EternalFury
·3 か月前·議論
There are people who think knowledge discovery is just a matter of parroting past behavior and trying things at random until something sticks. I don’t.
EternalFury
·4 か月前·議論
Force is supreme until you use it, then everyone knows it has limits.
EternalFury
·4 か月前·議論
So…calculators are intelligent? How about accountants that failed arithmetic 101 in high-school, are they intelligent? Generally intelligent?
EternalFury
·4 か月前·議論
We are jagged, but we can smooth that jaggedness if we choose to do so. LLMs stay jagged.
EternalFury
·4 か月前·議論
The real question is: Can it be generated using programs? If it can be, then LLMs will eventually monkey type these programs.
EternalFury
·4 か月前·議論
Yes. I doubt it can do that.
EternalFury
·4 か月前·議論
I am thinking there’s a large category of problems that can be solved by resampling existing proofs. It’s the kind of brute force expedition machine can attempt relentlessly where humans would go mad trying. It probably doesn’t really advance the field, but it can turn conjectures into theorems.
EternalFury
·7 か月前·議論
It does seem good, but it’s slow.