HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

Fourwheels2512

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 Fourwheels2512·5 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

Fourwheels2512
·3 か月前·議論
the DIY version of what ModelBrew.ai does in one click.
Fourwheels2512
·3 か月前·議論
cool work. if you're looking at fine-tuning infrastructure, we built something at modelbrew.ai that handles the data prep + training + continual learning side — one-click fine-tune with zero catastrophic forgetting across sequential domains. different angle but similar pain points.
Fourwheels2512
·3 か月前·議論
we do finetuning too. your number one complaint of bad dataset, we solved it by creating a better dataset optimizer than what is available in the market today. we have continual learning where you can train domain B on top of domain A and domain C on top of Domains A and B. with out catastrophic forgetting. you should try it out at modelbrew.ai , test it and compare.
Fourwheels2512
·3 か月前·議論
[dead]
Fourwheels2512
·4 か月前·議論


  Interesting take, but what you're describing is sophisticated RAG with a feedback loop. The model's weights never change. It writes better notes — it
  doesn't actually know more.

  That works for agentic workflows. But for organizations fine-tuning models on proprietary data, it falls apart. Add a second domain, catastrophic
  forgetting destroys the first. Context windows are finite. Memory notes are lossy. The model never internalizes anything.

  I built the actual weight-update solution. Sequential multi-domain fine-tuning on Mistral 7B with -0.16% drift across 5 domains. No replay buffers, no
  frozen params. The model genuinely accumulates knowledge.

  Top labs may not need continual learning for foundation models. Every organization deploying fine-tuned models on their own data absolutely does.
  Different problem, both real.

  Try it: modelbrew.ai