HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

GPerson

228 カルマ登録 7 年前

コメント

GPerson
·一昨日·議論
Is anthropic paying you guys for all this free advertising dang? This is pathetic.
GPerson
·3 日前·議論
It’s not.

Novels are fiction by the way.
GPerson
·18 日前·議論
Anyone willing to put Ghibli themed AI slop on their page has nothing to share about truth, unless their truth is that management is fundamentally unethical.
GPerson
·先月·議論
That proof has almost no significance because the average mathematician cannot spend 2 million dollars on inference.
GPerson
·7 か月前·議論
And it’s just a copy of notepad from windows xp.
GPerson
·7 か月前·議論
Did you come up with that? If so, bravo!
GPerson
·7 か月前·議論
You can try. What happens is it cheats you at every turn and finally admits it wasn’t testing anything when you ask why it’s still broken.

Yes, this actually happens.
GPerson
·7 か月前·議論
Rigorously designing and understanding the system does not sound like what you were referring to in the original post.

All of my heroes always said the difficult part is not in the writing of the code, but in the reading/understanding of it.
GPerson
·7 か月前·議論
The step you describe is the main use case I’ve found where vibe coding actually makes sense. Going from there to actually make a good version of the thing then becomes more hands on.
GPerson
·7 か月前·議論
I’ve done a lot of vibe coding and I just can’t understand these takes. Pure vibe coding is not going to get you to a good result, so the alchemist you describe is still very much essential, and as far as I can see will be for a very long time.
GPerson
·7 か月前·議論
I agree. Vibe coding eventually just becomes repetitively QA testing the work of a bad engineer.
GPerson
·8 か月前·議論
“It's redundant to say "I think" at any point in an opinion piece.”

“But is there still value in human produced writing? Subjectively, yes. Objectively? I'm not sure. I think there's a lot of personal value in writing though.”

There is value because I felt compelled to engage, but if it turns out you’re a bot then I’ll feel cheated and less likely to read other blog posts.
GPerson
·8 か月前·議論
I found this to be a disturbing read. Do not recommend.
GPerson
·8 か月前·議論
It definitely has its amazing moments, but sometimes I get caught in a loop of expecting it to do the thing, it not working, and spinning my wheels a lot instead of just solving it myself. I think I’m still learning how to use the tools effectively, but the random nature of it makes it difficult.
GPerson
·8 か月前·議論
So your stance is that it is impossible to create a simulated intelligence which is not conscious? That seems like the less likely possibility to me.

I do think it’s clearly possible to manufacture a conscious mind.
GPerson
·8 か月前·議論
The more I interact with these the less I’m afraid these tools will make life meaningless. (Can’t speak on art generation tools. Those still depress me.) It doesn’t matter what you’re making there are still a lot of hard parts even with the best versions of these tools. I doubt a good software developer can be replaced totally unless these get way better.

The best use cases are for code that’s clearly not an end product. You can just try way more ideas and get a sense of which are likely to pan out. That is tremendously valuable. When I start reading the code they produce, I quickly find many ways I would have written it differently though.
GPerson
·8 か月前·議論
So you’re not buying the idea that with increased productivity those tools will quickly follow?
GPerson
·8 か月前·議論
Have you tried claude code? I despise AI to my bones but even I can’t say claude code is not impressive.

If any anthropic reps read this, I think you guys, while probably better than open AI and meta, possibly Google, are delusional and are more likely to destroy the world than create infinite human life.
GPerson
·8 か月前·議論
Reddit is partially owned by Sam Altman and they have deals with llm companies to sell the data. The content has been and will continue to be grabbed by everyone who can pay.
GPerson
·8 か月前·議論
This crowd would sooner believe silicon hardware (an arbitrary human invention from the 50s-60s) will have the physical properties required for consciousness than accept that they participate in torturing literally a hundred billion consciousness animals every year.