This sounds like an enjoyable interview, even from the applicants point of view.
Do you follow up on your decisions to see how it held up regarding false positives you did accept, if any? I mean as related to the heuristics, not performance review generally.
You are right, of course; The foundational (technical) value isn't based on speculation but that is irrelevant to con-artists or crime organisations who are looking for their next hype product to drive a new round of frauds.
The people I see most enthusiastic about the current AI development are not the technologist and developers, but people who aren't involved in tech and doesn't code. There's already adverts on social media for ChatGPT AI services of various trustworthiness. They claim their AIs can construct and implement “the” winning trading algorithms for anyone, for a fee, of course.
This issue isn't on GPT per se, but many can't yet see the difference between plausible applications and those which aren't. With each fantastical story about what ChatGPT managed to do, it's hard to blame them.
Do you follow up on your decisions to see how it held up regarding false positives you did accept, if any? I mean as related to the heuristics, not performance review generally.