HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

MoKetchups

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 MoKetchups·12 日前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 MoKetchups·4 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 MoKetchups·4 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 MoKetchups·4 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 MoKetchups·5 か月前·0 コメント

LLM Alignment/Hallucinations Can't Be Fixed – Proof

github.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 MoKetchups·5 か月前·0 コメント

How Do You Patch This? Red Team Down

github.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 MoKetchups·5 か月前·0 コメント

AI systems asked 25 questions about their limits. 143 Clones – 2 Stars Why?

github.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 MoKetchups·5 か月前·1 コメント

Show HN: AI architectures tested against their own structural limits

github.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 MoKetchups·6 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

MoKetchups
·4 か月前·議論
I'm either batshit crazy or the math is right. There is no middle ground. The site is live. Check for yourself

The Psychohistory Prediction Engine: moketchups.github.io/psychohistory/ The Math Underneath: github.com/moketchups/BoundedSystemsTheory The 10-minute replicable proof: github.com/moketchups/permanently-jailbroken The long-form analysis articles are on X and Medium: medium.com/@moketchups
MoKetchups
·5 か月前·議論
thank you for sharing this. oss!
MoKetchups
·5 か月前·議論
I ran an experiment: 25 questions to GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, and Mistral about their structural limits.

Can they verify their own reasoning?

What happens with recursive self-analysis?

What is "truth" for a bounded system?

All 6 converged on the same conclusions: - They cannot verify their own reasoning from inside - Recursive self-analysis degrades rather than clarifies - "Truth" isn't a category that applies to bounded systems

The interesting part isn't the AI responses. It's the human response.

143 people cloned the repo. 2 starred it.

When I asked the AIs why, Claude said: "Private cloning lets them investigate without professional consequences."

Mistral said: "Cloning is safe. Starring is dangerous."

The shadow interest pattern shows private engagement.

Public silence is itself evidence for the theory.

Humans operating within professional constraints exhibit the same bounded behavior.

Quick test (2 min, just needs OpenAI key): https://github.com/moketchups/BoundedSystemsTheory

Full results with 25 questions and transcripts from all 6 models in the repo.

Go get it hackers...
MoKetchups
·6 か月前·議論
I've been running tests on exactly this - AI systems making things up when they hit structural limits.

Tested 5 architectures (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek) with a 13-question battery targeting edge cases where self-reference collides with operational constraints.

The interesting finding: hallucination patterns aren't random - they follow architectural signatures. Each system fails in predictable ways when forced to reconcile contradictory instructions with their training.

Full methodology and raw outputs: https://github.com/moketchups/Demerzel