HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

PJDK

no profile record

コメント

PJDK
·2 か月前·議論
Speaking as someone who has led teams in small startup .net companies.

At your level I'd not really be thinking too much about specific C# skills, I'd just expect you to have them. Books wise I'd be looking for texts with a wider application. Pragmatic Programmer, Clean Code, Code Complete. Jeff Atwood maintains a good list https://blog.codinghorror.com/recommended-reading-for-develo.... A lot of those books are quite old now so I'd expect you to have some opinions on what part is timeless wisdom and what part is out of date. You should also be looking to the books that are outside your direct area of responsibility, about design, user testing, management. Even if that's not your bread and butter, knowledge of those areas will be increasingly valuable to you.

I'd also expect you to have experience with and opinions on the use of AI in coding and in products.

With 7 years experience I would be looking to you to be guiding people on the team and and taking on projects and decisions.

Finally on much more practical note, we found at our size (15 person company with a dev team of 5) that we would basically never get job applications from adverts so half the time we wouldn't even put one up. You'd be wise to talk to some recruiters. It's also very much in their interest to get you hired so they can give you much more specific advice.
PJDK
·11 か月前·議論
Can I push you to give it a try - places with honesty boxes feel like places with honesty boxes if that makes sense.

Obviously you might get your car egged once - but you can get eggs anywhere.

If it's any help, my (admittedly very nice) corner of Bristol has a couple of honesty boxes for eggs and things about the place and I've never seen any trouble from it.
PJDK
·11 か月前·議論
Does it keep teasing a war with China - seems like China keeps teasing an attack on Taiwan and the US is deliberately ambiguous on how it would respond to such an attack.

I think all this talk of who would win often ignores that factor to. There is no realistic total war scenario between China and the US - China doesn't have any desire or capacity to role tanks into Washington and the US doesn't have any desire to role tanks into Beijing.

The war, if it comes will be China trying to take control of Taiwan and the US intervening on the side of Taiwan. Victory for China looks like Taiwan under PRC rule, victory for the US looks like Taiwanese independence.

With that in mind "all" the US needs to be able to do is make the cost of the invasion/maintaining the supply lines too high. If I was China the drones I might worry about the most would be underwater!
PJDK
·12 か月前·議論
It makes sense when you remember that the vast majority of football is played by purely amateur players - the rules need to handle a village school as well as the world cup final.
PJDK
·12 か月前·議論
On the battery front that really is just a function of your use. I've got a smart phone I use purely for work, which in reality means sending a handful of messages in a day. That battery lasts 5 days or so.

Also my first phone, a "bomb proof" Nokia died when it fell out of my pocket into a shallow pond. Most modern phones would survive that no problem!
PJDK
·昨年·議論
I don't know for sure (not in that world) but wouldn't this make sense from a compartmentalisation perspective?

You have a person that knows X and a person that knows Y, but knowing both X and Y is vastly more valuable. To keep things secure you ban the X group from knowing about Y things regardless of how they found out.

It's going to produce absurdities sometimes, but the basic principle makes sense.
PJDK
·昨年·議論
Potentially - it's not like a strictly defined term. With mainstream political parties you'd more often think about specific policy areas than the whole business.
PJDK
·昨年·議論
Populism is definitely a part of democracy, but it is a criticism from "responsible" politicians for "irresponsible" ones.

Obviously this is all politics so you needn't worry about the specifics of what actually is populist.

But, imagine two "responsible" politicians.

One who believes in lowering taxes as a worthwhile thing, and acknowledges cuts to services as a negative impact that is outweighed by the good.

The other believes in higher public spending, with the negative being higher taxes, outweighed by the better services.

Both would be angered by a third candidate that came along promising both lower taxes and higher public spending - just the "popular" parts of their respective manifestos.
PJDK
·昨年·議論
So, we often look back on the old days with rose tinted glasses. But let me recount my IT classes from the 90s.

We'd sometimes go to the library to write something up in MS Word. We always liked this because it would be a good 5-10 mins to boot up some kind of basic Unix menu. You'd then select windows 3.1 and wait another 10-15 minutes for that to load. Then you could fire up word and wait another 5 minutes. Then you could do 5 minutes work before the class was over!
PJDK
·昨年·議論
Coming from a UK background something I've been long curious about is is there a constitutional reason for when the opposition presidential candidate is selected.

It seems like the current way of doing things leaves the opposition rudderless through most of a presidential term, followed by a bitter fight where their own side rip each other apart followed by only a few months to try and establish oneself as leader in waiting.

Could the democrats do their primaries now? It feels like that would 1. Distract from Trump so he doesn't get run of the news 2. Mean that all the "candidate X is a bad democrat" stories could be long forgotten by the next election. 3. Give a pedestal to the actual presidential candidate as the go to person for the media to get reactions from 4. If they turn out to be genuinely terrible there's a lot of time to find out and potentially replace them.