HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

ProfHewitt

no profile record

コメント

ProfHewitt
·4 年前·議論
ActorsTheory serves as the rigorous mathematical foundations of capability systems.
ProfHewitt
·4 年前·議論
Foundation is about rigorously specifying the general Laws of Locality for Actor systems that CHERI implements.
ProfHewitt
·4 年前·議論
Great to see further progress on CHERI!

See the following for theoretical foundations for the work:

Linux 60th Anniversary Keynote

https://t.co/IRe3vpMlWn
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
Interesting article.

Mathematical foundations are needed that are much more suitable to modern Computer Science than using "universes".

For an example see the following article:

https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3603021

Also, see the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJP1VL7shiI
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
Computer science theory didn't get harder.

Instead, education became weaker :-(

See following link for foundations of computer Science:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJP1VL7shiI
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
The Actors Abstraction does not require specification of

computer boundaries.
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
The Actors Abstraction is foundational for computer science

analogous to the Natural Numbers in classical mathematics.
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
Probably not a good idea to burden application programmers

with having to annotate each message send with whether the

receiver is on the current computer or another one in a

Citadel.

Since Actors can move between computers in a Citadel, such

annotations are infeasible in practice.

Of course, modularity, security, and performance should not be

ignored.
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
See the following for a rigorous definition of the Actors Abstraction:

https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3418003
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
Probably can't make much progress without a scientific foundation including the Actors Abstraction.
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
The Actor Paradigm is much more widespread with offerings from Microsoft, Lightbend, etc.
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
I fondly remember Joe Armstrong, who was a good friend.

However, not having a mathematical foundation has been a

severe limitation for Erlang.

The Erlang community is trying to dig its way out with

modifications and extensions. Still have a long way to go.

Of course, no Actors framework is perfect.

Many important implementations have been done Erlang.

Also, significant Erlang projects are ongoing to good effect.
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
Erlang has absolutely no security :-(
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
In a Citadel, distributed Actors are going to be necessary.

See the following:

    Citadels: faster response time and better information integration than remote datacenters 
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2836282
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
Also see offerings from Lightbend and Microsoft.
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
Erlang incorporated some of the ideas of the Actor Abstraction

but missed a few things. See

See article and video here:

https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3603021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJP1VL7shiI
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
Swift Actors are an important contribution to the Actor Paradigm.

There is is an upcoming keynote address on the Actor Paradigm at the Linux 30th Anniversary Conference. See

https://reactivesummit2021.sched.com
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
Both ASIO and Sender/Receiver are not a suitable foundation for concurrency in C++.
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
As dueling co-routine proposals neither ASIO nor Sender/Receiver are a suitable foundation for C++ semantics.
ProfHewitt
·5 年前·議論
Async co-routines are not a suitable foundation for C++ semantics.