HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

RataNova

565 カルマ登録 昨年

コメント

RataNova
·9 日前·議論
The main thing I'd worry about is long-term reliability
RataNova
·9 日前·議論
A little e-ink status tile for temps, build status, now playing, or just a static label would be much more interesting than most decorative inserts
RataNova
·9 日前·議論
I wish more hardware companies treated these kinds of optional add-ons as something the community can run with instead of either productizing them badly or locking them away completely...
RataNova
·19 日前·議論
I'd guess texture and(or) smell might matter as much as the actual meat
RataNova
·19 日前·議論
Bebop: "I don't fully understand the model but I support increasing the sample size"
RataNova
·19 日前·議論
Yep, I have seen dogs that clearly have "a side" for certain habits, even if it is not obvious whether it is paw preference, training, comfort...
RataNova
·19 日前·議論
I liked that the post surfaced the bias instead of quietly ignoring it
RataNova
·19 日前·議論
Even in a simple setup with one dog and five treats, the measurement process can still sneak into the result
RataNova
·先月·議論
Maybe the better takeaway is not "larger cells can't work" but "larger cells need to pay for increasingly elaborate workarounds"
RataNova
·先月·議論
That framing makes the article feel even more interesting, because it's not just "cells are small because diffusion gets slow". There's also an energy budget behind it
RataNova
·先月·議論
I like explanations like this because they make biology feel much less arbitrary
RataNova
·先月·議論
I think the paralegal analogy is right, but with one important difference: a human paralegal usually knows when they are unsure, or at least can be trained to flag uncertainty
RataNova
·先月·議論
I think that's the right intuition. Legal AI feels especially dangerous because the output can look competent while hiding jurisdiction-specific footguns
RataNova
·先月·議論
This is exactly why I'd be cautious about interpreting the preference metric too strongly
RataNova
·先月·議論
Agreed. The study might show something useful, but the headline is doing a lot of work.
RataNova
·先月·議論
I'd read this less as "AI replaces law professors" and more as "AI may be a surprisingly strong first-pass tutor, especially when the student knows enough to question it"
RataNova
·先月·議論
The arcologies are such a perfect example of what these games did well
RataNova
·先月·議論
[dead]
RataNova
·先月·議論
There's something wonderful about this kind of PC game preservation
RataNova
·2 か月前·議論
Solar Roof made sense when panels were seen as something to disguise