HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

RustSupremacist

110 カルマ登録 10 か月前

投稿

Qt Bindings for Rust

github.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·2 か月前·0 コメント

What we heard about Rust's challenges, and how we can address them

blog.rust-lang.org
2 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·4 か月前·0 コメント

The Functional Programming Hiring Problem

blog.janissary.xyz
36 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·4 か月前·14 コメント

How Safe Is the Rust Ecosystem? A Deep Dive into Crates.io

mr-leshiy-blog.web.app
2 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·6 か月前·0 コメント

Rust's Downfall: From Rising Star to Rejected by Major Projects (2025)

freedium-mirror.cfd
2 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·6 か月前·2 コメント

OpenAI Supply Co

supply.openai.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·7 か月前·1 コメント

DQt

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·7 か月前·0 コメント

Rust Isn't the Future of Systems Programming – It's Just the Hype Cycle

freedium-mirror.cfd
29 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·8 か月前·39 コメント

Why Zig Is Quietly Doing What Rust Couldn't: Staying Simple

freedium-mirror.cfd
43 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·8 か月前·33 コメント

Why Zig Is Quietly Doing What Rust Couldn't: Staying Simple

freedium-mirror.cfd
14 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·8 か月前·17 コメント

Zig Looked Like the Future – Until We Tried Multithreading

freedium-mirror.cfd
6 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·8 か月前·3 コメント

The state of the Rust dependency ecosystem

00f.net
2 ポイント·投稿者 RustSupremacist·9 か月前·1 コメント

コメント

RustSupremacist
·5 日前·議論
This reminds me that the Rust Foundation is a 501(c)(6) and not a 501(c)(3) like the Zig Software Foundation. To me, the Rust Foundation would do better for the community if they were a 501(c)(3) and more transparent about finances.
RustSupremacist
·5 日前·議論
501(c)(3) organizations are non-profits that include charities, whereas 501(c)(6) organizations are non-profits with less strict requirements. Both are tax-exempt federally, but 501(c)(3) organizations have higher financial transparency requirements and higher restrictions on political activity (which qualifies donations to 501(c)s as tax-deductible).

The Rust Foundation is a 501(c)(6) and not a 501(c)(3). The Rust Foundation would do better for the community if they were a 501(c)(3) and more transparent about finances. The Rust Foundation should change their governance structure to a 501(c)(3) instead of a 501(c)(6).
RustSupremacist
·17 日前·議論
Donations to the Zig Software Foundation largely go to contributors to the language. Meanwhile, donations to the Rust Foundation largely go into pockets unknown.

The key difference is that the Rust Foundation is a 501(c)(6) and not a 501(c)(3). The Rust Foundation would do better for the community if they were a 501(c)(3) and more transparent about finances. Follow this example for the greater good.
RustSupremacist
·27 日前·議論
Rust needs good Qt bindings. None of the existing projects will ever reach Qt. Rust. Cargo. Qt. Go did it with https://github.com/mappu/miqt. Zig did it with https://github.com/rcalixte/libqt6zig. When will Rust do it? The time is now.
RustSupremacist
·2 か月前·議論
There are bindings for Go (https://github.com/mappu/miqt) and Zig (https://github.com/rcalixte/libqt6zig) but not for Rust. We need bindings like these for Rust.
RustSupremacist
·2 か月前·議論
This is not what the people want. Understand that. Give us Rust and Qt. Why be so focused on trying to sell something that doesn't measure up? Even beta Bridges is better than Slint. Take the advice and put the energy to better use for the good of Rust.
RustSupremacist
·3 か月前·議論
We need to go back to when the front page of the site was only Rust posts.
RustSupremacist
·5 か月前·議論
[flagged]
RustSupremacist
·5 か月前·議論
The GUI situation for Rust is dire. We are still not GUI yet! Even if Rust isn't the best for GUI, the opportunity is still there. Qt is the best option. There isn't a second option. Don't let Go and Zig have bindings for Qt without Rust! Only Rust. Only Cargo. No QML. No C++. No markup. No immediate mode. No dead projects.
RustSupremacist
·6 か月前·議論
The most charitable interpretation of this is that the Reddit mods should stick to Reddit. If they had, this wouldn't have reflected so poorly on them.
RustSupremacist
·6 か月前·議論
This attitude is why the project has toxic maintainers from Germany to China: https://xcancel.com/QULuseslignux/status/1918296149724692968
RustSupremacist
·7 か月前·議論
This author is not someone who should be reporting on Rust especially in the kernel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVC1gp2PS8U&t=1538s
RustSupremacist
·7 か月前·議論
The GUI situation in Rust is dreadful: https://www.boringcactus.com/2025/04/13/2025-survey-of-rust-...

Rust is simply not meant for GUI-based data design but I still want Qt in Rust. That's it. Not QML or Slint or egui or Tauri or gpui or Iced. No markup at all. None of the immediate mode things. No double and triple languages like this C++ mess. Definitely not GTK or the other non-imperative subpar things. There is one option. Until there is more than one, Qt is the best. No one else is worried about this missed opportunity.
RustSupremacist
·7 か月前·議論
[flagged]
RustSupremacist
·7 か月前·議論
[flagged]
RustSupremacist
·7 か月前·議論
[flagged]
RustSupremacist
·7 か月前·議論
What does it say about your latest project that it attracts the most toxic types from Germany to China^? Are you even aware? Do you consider this "building the right group of talent" for your project?

^https://xcancel.com/QULuseslignux/status/1918296149724692968
RustSupremacist
·7 か月前·議論
This highlights the value of having non-profits as a 501(c)(3). The transparency about Hack Club is refreshing.

The Rust Foundation is a 501(c)(6) and not a 501(c)(3). The Rust Foundation would do better for the community if they were a 501(c)(3) and more transparent about finances. Follow this example for the greater good.
RustSupremacist
·7 か月前·議論
This is a total victory for Rust. Zig was making progress before this. Now the project is going to black hole itself in the most tone deaf and spectacular way possible. Not even a mirror? Way to accept total defeat.
RustSupremacist
·8 か月前·議論
[flagged]