HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

SECProto

no profile record

コメント

SECProto
·先月·議論
> The truth is that Canadians simply don't seem all that interested in purchasing American dairy products

Yup, taking this a bit off topic: I've always bought dairy products with the blue cow on it (signifies Canadian dairy). The US dairy industry only wants to export into Canada when they have excess, and leave us dry when they don't, so i strongly support Canadian dairy production.
SECProto
·3 か月前·議論
> Call it 5kw/h in 1/60 hours, thats 3000kw, at 700v thats still roughly 4000 amps. (Please correct my head math.)

5 kWh * 60 = 300 kW

at 800V (typical charging voltage) that is 375A

(still huge, but an order of magnitude less)
SECProto
·4 か月前·議論
I'm saying that data (not anecdotes) on those would've been better justification for your ranking.

That said, for most people, going abroad for surgery or to buy a home is not an option.
SECProto
·4 か月前·議論
Also Canada, and I disagree pretty strongly with your post. Those two statistics have little bearing on happiness. Housing costs and healthcare access are much bigger concerns.
SECProto
·5 か月前·議論
If it brings you moral discomfort, why do you shop at whole foods? Shopping at Walmart (or whole foods!) would also bring me moral discomfort, so I just ...don't do it.
SECProto
·5 か月前·議論
> NASA's 25 billion dollar budget for 2025 was a paltry ~.04% of the total government budget.

I'm sorry, I think you have a math or data error here. The US government budget for 2025 was not $62.5 trillion dollars.
SECProto
·5 か月前·議論
That's because Nova launcher sold to new owners (whose presumed only goal is to serve ads)
SECProto
·6 か月前·議論
> Yeah in his case it's his editor he really misses which is probably why he hasn't released anything since she died.

You're referring to Sally Menke? Tarantino has released 3 movies since then.
SECProto
·6 か月前·議論
> Something like 50% of marine fuel usage is shipping fossil fuels around the world

Note that marine shipping is extraordinarily fuel efficient (from a gCO2/(t*km) basis), so I doubt that it adds a lot on a per ton of fuel basis. We just ship a lot of fossil fuels.

This [1] graph looks to be in the right ballpark from what i remember in school 15 years ago, i didn't verify it in depth but +- an order of magnitude better than the next best method is roughly right

https://image2.slideserve.com/4166134/gco-2-t-km-of-freight-...
SECProto
·6 か月前·議論
Yes, doubling then subtracting 10% of the resultant works because that is the same as multiplying by 1.8 :)

When going the other way and dividing, I similarly find it mentally easier to multiply by 10/18 (rather than just divide by 1.8)
SECProto
·6 か月前·議論
No need to simplify this.

(F - 32) / 1.8 = C

C * 1.8 + 32 = F

I personally find the math just as easy to do accurately. For example, 87F -32/1.8 = 55/1.8 =~30.5C. Compare that to your approximate method, which would give 28.5C, which is just wrong

(Maybe I just got really good at this when working a public facing job with a lot of American tourists - they would ask what our celsius temperatures were "in real units", so I got quite comfortable converting the air and water temps. Fahrenheit never once became intuitive to me, though.)
SECProto
·6 か月前·議論
> I can run faster than the TTC streetcar

Yeah, so can I - doesn't mean much. The streetcar is not where TTC excels in ridership, the subway and buses are.
SECProto
·6 か月前·議論
> It's for just 50k vehicles, which means that the first 50k that get sent will be all Luxury high margin electric vehicles. [...] Why would anyone use there quota for cheap stuff?

If you find a better primary source, you'll see that the lower price vehicles are the only thing allowed at the low tariff rate:

The deal covers vehicles priced at $33,000 or less, and other cars sold at that price are already manufactured offshore

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/livestory/canada-china-elec...
SECProto
·6 か月前·議論
> Massive trucks are useful for construction.

No, trucks are useful, but a massive modern pickup truck is much less useful in the urban context than a standard pickup truck from 30 years ago. The bed size has remained the same, the outside envelope of the vehicle has ballooned massively.

> You should get better transit so less people have cars.

Toronto has a very high (for north america) transit mode share
SECProto
·7 か月前·議論
Correct - where I am it is cheaper most of the year, a bit more expensive in the winter.
SECProto
·7 か月前·議論
Fuel is sold by volume, which is why volumetric fuel efficiency is desirable to the consumer
SECProto
·7 か月前·議論
> but was struggling (am still) to see how it relates to a wooden trough that merely holds cables.

Overhead Catenary [1] is a standard term, for a system that has two wires overhead - one suspended from the posts (forming a series of catenary curve), the other suspended from that cable at regular intervals (and held level relative to the track). The wood in Boston's system seems to replace the catenary cable.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overhead_line#Overhead_catenar...
SECProto
·8 か月前·議論
You have an inbuilt assumption about the purpose of a street name. Compare it with addresses in Japan [1], where some streets don't even have names. I don't know anything about Pakistan, but i wouldn't be surprised if the street name is solely to differentiate within some small geographic area. Looking at street view[2] from a nearby real estate development supports this

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_addressing_system

[2] https://maps.app.goo.gl/sfoKSP5yRU41yS8w5
SECProto
·8 か月前·議論
Note that this setting (only accessible from desktop) also blocks spellcheck, a feature that absolutely does not need AI to implement
SECProto
·9 か月前·議論
Not defending mozilla adding AI to firefox, but...

If you've tried chrome recently, you'll know that it's jam packed full with even more stuff you don't want. And the article lays out how to easily disable all AI in firefox (which you cant do at all in Chrome)