HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

Scott_Helme_

no profile record

投稿

The most popular sites that still don't support passkeys

whynopasskeys.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 Scott_Helme_·24 日前·8 コメント

コメント

Scott_Helme_
·23 日前·議論
No, it was more broad than just SE domains, but trying to detect whether a site is suitable for passkeys support automatically is quite the challenge. Some don't allow themselves to be crawled so require manual verification.
Scott_Helme_
·24 日前·議論
I'm not entirely sure that it does, which bit of passkeys are you concerned most with?
Scott_Helme_
·24 日前·議論
This is fixed now: https://whynopasskeys.com/country/se
Scott_Helme_
·2 か月前·議論
Interesting, could you link me to some of those sites so I can investigate?
Scott_Helme_
·2 か月前·議論
I can kind of see it, but you can also just use an authenticator from any manufacturer, or have multiple types that you use? I'm just curious what I'm overlooking.
Scott_Helme_
·2 か月前·議論
What's the concern with using passkeys?
Scott_Helme_
·6 か月前·議論
I did try to make it clear in the article.

We're powering 2 x EVs, have two adults working from home full time, I have a server rack under the stairs, and we have a hot tub outside.
Scott_Helme_
·6 か月前·議論
Absolutely — tariff choice, storage, and automation make a huge difference.

The article isn’t claiming this setup is universally optimal, just showing what’s possible when those pieces are combined and used deliberately.
Scott_Helme_
·6 か月前·議論
We had an expensive solar install due to restrictions around our roof, so the solar would typically have been cheaper.

Another consideration is that battery installations in the UK are charged at 20% VAT, but if they're installed as part of a solar installation, they're charged at 0% VAT. So even if your main interest is in getting the batteries, a small solar install might make sense because of the savings.
Scott_Helme_
·6 か月前·議論
The only restriction placed on you is the export rate, which is provided to you by the DNO here in the UK. We had a limit of 3.8kW placed, which is programmed in to the batteries by the installer.

Octopus also have more flexible battery export tariffs if you want to explore those: https://octopus.energy/smart/flux/
Scott_Helme_
·6 か月前·議論
Nah, there's no Bitcoin mining, honest!
Scott_Helme_
·6 か月前·議論
How did you know about my laser?!
Scott_Helme_
·5 年前·議論
Thanks! Sometimes the simple tricks are the best ones :)
Scott_Helme_
·5 年前·議論
There is no reason to differentiate between free certificates and paid certificates. The process works in exactly the same way for either.
Scott_Helme_
·5 年前·議論
They're all 3 certificates long (leaf/intermediate/root) apart from Let's Encrypt which, due to their cross-signature, are 4 certificates long for ECC.
Scott_Helme_
·5 年前·議論
If you were to use the same private key for the 4 certificates then you could seamlessly switch between whichever leaf certificate you wanted to serve to the client. I'm not aware of the ability to send multiple leaf certificates to a client for consideration though.
Scott_Helme_
·5 年前·議論
Let's Encrypt can issue from an ECC chain, I've tweeted[1] the details on how to enable your account for that.

[1] https://twitter.com/Scott_Helme/status/1392101598852222976
Scott_Helme_
·5 年前·議論
If you get a 1 year certificate then yeah, but otherwise no. The requirement to re-validate the DNS record comes not from the CA or the use of ACME, but the Baseline Requirements[1] §4.2.1, to prove you are still in control of the domain on a somewhat regular basis to obtain new certificates. Every 3 months is more frequent than is required, but there is still a regular (398 day) DCV requirement.

[1] https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/CA-Browser-Forum-BR-...