HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

Shoop

no profile record

投稿

The Saga of Multicore OCaml [video]

youtube.com
7 ポイント·投稿者 Shoop·12 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 Shoop·12 か月前·0 コメント

Making OCaml Safe for Performance Engineering [video]

youtube.com
13 ポイント·投稿者 Shoop·昨年·3 コメント

Regarding Some Aspects of the Present Economic Financial System (2018)

cftc.gov
3 ポイント·投稿者 Shoop·昨年·0 コメント

The Games Behind Your Government's Next War [video]

youtube.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 Shoop·2 年前·0 コメント

China's Policy Failures

asteriskmag.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 Shoop·2 年前·0 コメント

How We Can Control AI

wsj.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 Shoop·2 年前·0 コメント

Introduction to free software and the liberation of cyberspace (2014)

fsf.org
11 ポイント·投稿者 Shoop·3 年前·2 コメント

Intelligence Testing

asteriskmag.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 Shoop·3 年前·0 コメント

コメント

Shoop
·2 か月前·議論
I think robustness is helped a lot by the fact that it’s the production compiler used at Jane Street
Shoop
·11 か月前·議論
Yes! https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17424
Shoop
·昨年·議論
> I suspect this is the real reason Clojure was created, I bet Rich was just really bored.

Rich has written about the history and motivation behind Clojure here: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3386321
Shoop
·2 年前·議論
What are the consistency semantics?
Shoop
·2 年前·議論
What are some examples of those tasks? It’s difficult for me to tell what problems this is intended to solve
Shoop
·2 年前·議論
Puzzmo Typeshift is a similar game: https://www.puzzmo.com/play/typeshift/
Shoop
·2 年前·議論
Didn’t 538 give Trump an ~1-in-3 chance of winning?
Shoop
·2 年前·議論
I’m guessing that the synchronous update architecture they’re using only really only makes sense for persistent memory and that this couldn’t easily be adapted to conventional hard drives or SSDs?
Shoop
·2 年前·議論
Can anyone summarize the major differences between this and Scaling Monosemanticity?
Shoop
·3 年前·議論
How does two way isolation work? How do you prevent the host kernel (which presumably has full control of the hardware?) from inspecting the guest VM?
Shoop
·3 年前·議論
OCaml has a separate language for module interfaces where types are required. Even better, it allows you to abstract over types and make them entirely opaque, so that users of an interface never have to look at any of the implementation details.
Shoop
·3 年前·議論
Related email by John Carmack: http://number-none.com/blow/blog/programming/2014/09/26/carm...

Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12120752
Shoop
·7 年前·議論
Even if you never want to write any Perl code, I definitely recommend checking out some of the features of Raku. As someone who is interested in language design but never has (or likely will) use Perl for a project, I still found reading about Raku's feature set super interesting. Here's a whimsical slide deck that introduces a lot of the most interesting features: [0]. Even if you find yourself shaking your head at all the craziness, you at least have to admire Raku's success at fulfilling its goals of being a post-modern language optimized for fun (-Ofun).

[0] http://tpm2016.zoffix.com/#/