HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

Tenobrus

no profile record

コメント

Tenobrus
·2 か月前·議論
what basis do you have for assuming an LLM is fundamentally incapable of doing this?
Tenobrus
·2 か月前·議論
o1 has a METR time horizon of around 40 minutes, opus 4.7 has an implied horizon of 18 hours based on its ECI score. this study is on a model that's several generations behind wrt the kind of tasks it can complete. it would be shocking if this number were anywhere near as low with GPT 5.5, to the point it seems nearly totally irrelevant to talk about these results
Tenobrus
·3 か月前·議論
"Japanese soldier who kept fighting 29 years after World War 2"
Tenobrus
·4 か月前·議論
those two stipulations were always their only ones, and they were included explicitly in their original contract with the DoW.
Tenobrus
·6 か月前·議論
some ai detectors work now. pangram detects this as 57% AI written, and the parts it thinks are human are.... the ascii diagrams / screenshots. all the actual text it detects as generated.
Tenobrus
·6 か月前·議論
strongly think you should go read the thread to get a sense of the level of expertise and amount of effort put in by the humans involved: https://www.erdosproblems.com/forum/thread/728#post-2852
Tenobrus
·7 か月前·議論
ai detectors are never totally accurate but this one is quite good and it suggests something like 80% of this article is llm generated. honestly idk how you didn't get that just by reading it tho, maybe you haven't been exposed to much modern llm-generated content?

https://www.pangram.com/history/5cec2f02-6fd6-4c97-8e71-d509...
Tenobrus
·2 年前·議論
It looks like the person who added the backdoor is in fact the current co-maintainer of the project (and the more active of the two): https://tukaani.org/about.html