HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

Titan2189

507 カルマ登録 8 年前

投稿

I tracked down the thief who stole $200k of Lego [video]

youtube.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 Titan2189·2 か月前·2 コメント

GRC Tool Vanta Forces Insecure CAA Configuration

help.vanta.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 Titan2189·9 か月前·1 コメント

コメント

Titan2189
·8 日前·議論
*no one
Titan2189
·13 日前·議論
Whenever the article mentions 'pause', it means 'parse', right?!
Titan2189
·2 か月前·議論
It's a pretty great documentary, currently still ongoing story.

I've really enjoyed watching it - quite captivating :)
Titan2189
·2 か月前·議論
> [...] that root was just my unprivileged podman user on the host

Couldn't you then simply re-run the exploit again as unprivileged podman user and gain root on the host?
Titan2189
·2 か月前·議論
I've only heard of the Red Pill in reference to the Matrix. Does it have that idea from "The Prince"?
Titan2189
·3 か月前·議論
Same. I thought 'Conputer' was quite a smart title in today's AI world
Titan2189
·4 か月前·議論
More historical photos of Selfridge

https://digitalcollections.museumofflight.org/nodes/search?k...
Titan2189
·5 か月前·議論
It's like JetLag the Game, but without ever leaving your house!
Titan2189
·5 か月前·議論
We use it in production. Workloads with unpredictable memory usage (32Mb to 4Gb per process), but we also want to start enough processes to saturate the CPU. Before we configured & enabled swap we were either sitting at low CPU utilisation or OOM
Titan2189
·6 か月前·議論
What's interesting about it? Wifi Mesh networks have been around for ... more than a decade?
Titan2189
·7 か月前·議論
The original report says

> The incorrect state persisted for approximately seven days before detection

However you're saying you've reached out "within a few minutes" ?
Titan2189
·7 か月前·議論
> Those other countries have much simpler tax codes than we do

All German readers spew out their drink in disbelief - Pardon what?
Titan2189
·7 か月前·議論
Probably just forgot the /s at the end
Titan2189
·7 か月前·議論
They're back online it seems
Titan2189
·8 か月前·議論
Then there's the 3rd option: Neither

Just keep everything in your inbox, find recent things by scrolling down, and anything beyond that is basically inaccessible, since the search is so bad

(I'm in camp archive everything, delete nothing; but see the Neither camp frequently in colleagues)
Titan2189
·8 か月前·議論
If you check the manual you might find that you can hook the single inlet pipe up to the hot water tap.
Titan2189
·9 か月前·議論
To configure the Vanta Trust Center (a publicly available page listing a client's Certifications and Controls, usually hosted at trust.client.tld), Vanta requires customers to compromise on their DNS CAA configuration.

As their screenshots show, they ask you setup a CNAME from e.g. trust.customer.com to their abc123.cname.vantatrust.com.

However, if you are using CAA [1] on your root domain (to limit which Certificate Authorities are allowed to issue certificates for your domain), they _require_ you to add 4 (FOUR) new CAA records to your root domain. (shown at the bottom of the linked page)

The correct solution would be to simply publish CAA records at the destination that the CNAME is pointing to (abc123.cname.vantatrust.com)

I've brought this up with their support multiple times; but they're refusing to even acknowledge that this is a problem. They're claiming I am the first customer to ever bring this up; and that I should just add the records on my root domain - completely missing that fact that thereby I'm basically undermining what CAA is for.

I would understand it, if this was some random tool, but this specifically is a GRC Tool.

If you are another Vanta customer or have any other idea what I can do to approach this, please let me know. I want to use their tool. It's a good system and helping us out - I'm just refusing to actively downgrade our Security - for our SECURITY TOOL!

1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_Certification_Authority_Au...
Titan2189
·9 か月前·議論
Yup

> We have identified the underlying issue with one of our cloud service providers.
Titan2189
·9 か月前·議論
[flagged]
Titan2189
·9 か月前·議論
I don't get it. Can you please explain the reference?