HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

ac29

7,240 カルマ登録 14 年前
email: [email protected]

投稿

Five CLIs Walk into a Context Window

theredbeard.io
2 ポイント·投稿者 ac29·4 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

ac29
·12 時間前·議論
Phased array radars are export controlled in the US. It doesnt mean its illegal to build or own, but it might be illegal to sell in some cases
ac29
·昨日·議論
llama.cpp supports a wide variety of 4-bit and smaller quants and mmap's models by default, so you dont need to be able to hold the weights in memory (the OS will handle bringing them in from storage as needed)

Its cool to see this implemented in a tiny amount of code without dependencies, but does it actually bring more performance?
ac29
·5 日前·議論
> So... maybe we can still use third party harnesses with Claude Code subscriptions... for now?

The way I read this is: yes, if the third party harness uses Anthropic's Agent SDK. Most of them do not, AFAIK, and are still against ToS (though maybe its not enforced for now)
ac29
·9 日前·議論
Giving users ability to use apt with root privileges is pretty much game over security wise. Full root is a malicious package away
ac29
·9 日前·議論
> Anthropic just provides a subscription - which Enterprise usually doesn't want you to use because everything you're submitting through that will be trained on / becomes part of their model.

My Pro account very clearly has a toggle for "Help improve our AI models: Allow the use of your chats and coding sessions to train and improve Anthropic AI models."
ac29
·12 日前·議論
The inference providers are running batch sizes much larger than 10
ac29
·15 日前·議論
I'm certainly willing to believe the M1 was the most energy efficient, but your data center didnt have anything faster than a laptop?
ac29
·15 日前·議論
I did my first ESP32 project recently and was amazed you can get a system that starts up Micropython, then a Wifi AP, DNS, and Web Server in a second or two total and uses less than 512kB RAM. And thats with a high level programming language.
ac29
·15 日前·議論
> IBM no longer owns any fabs

Per IBM: "IBM Research at Albany [...] includes more than 100,000 square feet of semiconductor fabrication space"

I guess that is technically a R&D fab not a production one, but they definitely have in house fabrication capability
ac29
·18 日前·議論
Most real financial transactions need to start and end in fiat though, and that's where the costs are
ac29
·22 日前·議論
A change in regulations is not a meritless argument, it's useful information
ac29
·24 日前·議論
You could subscribe to Anthropic/OpenAI for the rest of your life for the cost it would take to host GLM5.2 locally - you need 1.5TB of VRAM just for the weights
ac29
·25 日前·議論
> I'd rather use Sonnet than Qwen

I get this, though the pace of Chinese releases is relentless. Qwen3.7 Plus/Max (closed variants) feel notably better than Qwen3.6, and Minimax M3 is a big jump from 2.7 in capability as well. Both of these families had their previous major release less than 90 days ago.

Anthropic must have Sonnet 5 either waiting or cooking though, they said smaller and larger models than Opus were coming and we already briefly had the larger model.
ac29
·26 日前·議論
If you use uv, python apps use a shared cache which helps a lot.
ac29
·28 日前·議論
All current Qwen 3.7 models are closed though they have said more releases are coming
ac29
·29 日前·議論
Been using zmx for a few months and love it: https://github.com/neurosnap/zmx/

Very similar, based on libghostty
ac29
·先月·議論
> I'm curious what the downside for this speed is here

"DiffusionGemma's speedup is designed for local and low-concurrency inference. In high-QPS cloud serving, autoregressive models can be deployed to saturate compute efficiently, so DiffusionGemma's parallel decoding offers diminishing returns and can result in higher serving costs"
ac29
·先月·議論
Most of that cost was presumably the 100,000 GPUs it contains, they didn't even build the building
ac29
·先月·議論
According the the X post, each 150kW satellite is a bit over 2 tons, so a full year of launches would get you 75MW. Thats not much when AI datacenters are GW-class.
ac29
·先月·議論
> in the process standardized not just electric charging but the plug we're all using today

Wat? Are you talking about NACS? If so, a minority of non-Tesla EVs currently on the road use it in the US, and AFAIK zero outside of North America.

And even in the US, the vast majority of EV charging stations are AC and use J1772, a SAE standard that predates Tesla's existence.