HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

adyavanapalli

249 カルマ登録 9 年前
I like math and the stars.

投稿

Stanislav Petrov Did Bayes' Theorem in His Head

starsandmanifolds.xyz
2 ポイント·投稿者 adyavanapalli·4 か月前·0 コメント

Domain-Based Split Tunneling Using WireGuard

starsandmanifolds.xyz
5 ポイント·投稿者 adyavanapalli·6 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

adyavanapalli
·5 日前·議論
This is soooo incredibly cool. Beyond the Tom Riddle diary aspect, I love the idea of this as a new medium for interacting with an LLM. You could gift it to someone and they could just write naturally, their thoughts, questions, notes, and get responses back without typing or speaking. It feels less like a chatbot and more like a journal you can communicate through. You could give it a personality and all.
adyavanapalli
·26 日前·議論
For the edit tool, you should consider implementing a hash-based approach where each line of code is hashed and referenced by it when doing replacements. You can read up on the approach here: https://blog.can.ac/2026/02/12/the-harness-problem/

I didn't do much benchmarking, but anecdotally, I found it to be making less edit errors. YMMV
adyavanapalli
·2 か月前·議論
What you're talking about is so extremely rare that it's much more likely that the entire Earth is destroyed by an asteroid right this inst...
adyavanapalli
·2 か月前·議論
What are the numbers you are getting?
adyavanapalli
·3 か月前·議論
I had a chance to look at this and noticed you were sending telemetry to an endpoint you control: https://dirac.run/v1/event. It doesn't seem like you're sending anything obviously sensitive or doing anything in bad faith (though, I do see api errors being sent, which could potentially leak sensitive info), but you gotta admit that that's scary seeing you as the sole dev for this. Plus, it's opt out too. Sorry, it's no go for me.
adyavanapalli
·3 か月前·議論
I haven't tried it, but I'm curious why you decided to implement a whole new harness over just writing extensions in pi. From whatever I've done with pi so far, the extension api is quite extensive. Hash anchored edits, for example, can definitely be implemented in pi. Anyhow, thank you for showing us your project and will be checking it out later. Cheers!
adyavanapalli
·4 か月前·議論
It definitely _could be_ an agent harness issue. For example, this is the logic opencode uses:

1. Agent is "plan" -> inject PROMPT_PLAN

2. Agent is "build" AND a previous assistant message was from "plan" -> inject BUILD_SWITCH

3. Otherwise -> nothing injected

And these are the prompts used for the above.

PROMPT_PLAN: https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/dev/packages/open...

BUILD_SWITCH: https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/dev/packages/open...

Specifically, it has the following lines:

> You are permitted to make file changes, run shell commands, and utilize your arsenal of tools as needed.

I feel like that's probably enough to cause an LLM to change it's behavior.
adyavanapalli
·4 か月前·議論
I saw this a couple of years ago and felt that it might help you https://youtu.be/k7X7sZzSXYs?si=d1ibZfR9uKbuXpCd. Best of luck OP.