HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

anon_anon12

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 anon_anon12·4 か月前·0 コメント

Google Translate vulnerable to prompt injection

twitter.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 anon_anon12·5 か月前·0 コメント

Ask HN: Why the OpenClaw hype? What's so special?

5 ポイント·投稿者 anon_anon12·5 か月前·3 コメント

Ask HN: What if social media was mapped on to a globe?

2 ポイント·投稿者 anon_anon12·6 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

anon_anon12
·4 か月前·議論
Reminder, Moltbook had ton of security issues during release, iirc it was vibecoded. So, cybersec failed devs are getting jobs and apparently AI will take over jobs. Elites are so good at fear-mongering so that you join at a lower wage, don't ever underestimate your value guys!
anon_anon12
·5 か月前·議論
APKs were the only reason why I was using android in the first place
anon_anon12
·5 か月前·議論
Exactly, if an AI is able to curb around the basics, only then is it revolutionary
anon_anon12
·5 か月前·議論
The day an AI answers "Drive." without all the fuss. That's when we are near AGI ig
anon_anon12
·5 か月前·議論
Another company jumping on the bandwagon to data-farm in the pretext of safeguarding children. I really wonder if there's an actual method to actually safeguard children while also not holding on to data. Because, genuinely, you can't question this.. Companies would just say "we are trying to protect kids" and that'd be the end of the argument.
anon_anon12
·5 か月前·議論
Hell no. There's so much friction in setting up OpenClaw to be able to utilise it efficiently. Then the security concerns. I'd in no way want my daily driver to do something with my data that I didn't want it to do.
anon_anon12
·5 か月前·議論
Agreed. There's only so much a probabilistic model can do. It's all the effect of the copious amount of data it's fed, none of it is its own generated intelligence and somehow majority of the world doesn't seem to understand that. Generative Intelligence is NOT the future.
anon_anon12
·5 か月前·議論
I can imagine Musk selling these very models with AI slapped onto them and call it revolutionary
anon_anon12
·6 か月前·議論
I can envision this as being in the boots of Truman from Truman Show where some advertisement is thrown at your face randomly
anon_anon12
·6 か月前·議論
True, it was always greed veiled with an illusion of passion
anon_anon12
·6 か月前·議論
People's trust on LLM imo stems from the lack of awareness of AI hallucinating. Hallucination benchmarks are often hidden or talked about hastily in marketing videos.
anon_anon12
·6 か月前·議論
Yep including that too obviously, but OP isn't trying to market this I think, just sharing his passion project
anon_anon12
·6 か月前·議論
lol, chances of the same person using that kind of phrase and an em dash is so marginally low
anon_anon12
·6 か月前·議論
Well in my opinion there's nothing wrong with vibe-coding. You can completely use it to make your passion projects. I draw the line when people try to sell their vibe-coded project as something huge, putting people at the risk of potential security breaches while also taking money out of them.

Every other day I see ads of companies saying "use our AI and become a millionaire", this kind of marketing from agentic IDEs implies no need for developers who know their craft, which as said above, isn't the case.
anon_anon12
·6 か月前·議論
Well the dialogue there involves two or more people, when commenting, why would you use that.. Even if you have collaborators, you wouldn't very likely be discussing stuff through code comments..
anon_anon12
·6 か月前·議論
It was outrageous at start, especially in 2016, but surely after AI's boom, we are heading towards it. People have stopped becoming genuine.
anon_anon12
·6 か月前·議論
Coool
anon_anon12
·6 か月前·議論
Not a fan of AI making anything