HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

apwn

no profile record

投稿

Show HN: GDPRedirect – Become EU compliant in one line of code (satire)

gdpredirect.com
5 ポイント·投稿者 apwn·17 日前·0 コメント

Show HN: I built a site where you hire yourself instead of applying for jobs

hired.wtf
12 ポイント·投稿者 apwn·4 か月前·14 コメント

What FTX's investments would be worth today (based on public filings)

themissingbillions.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 apwn·5 か月前·2 コメント

コメント

apwn
·4 か月前·議論
it was my second choice haha
apwn
·4 か月前·議論
I would definitely love to hear about it. I made it for myself first. And will keep it all free
apwn
·4 か月前·議論
not chatgpt but it is mostly AI. The one hated by Trump right now. But you are right. Bad move on my side. (this is not AI)
apwn
·4 か月前·議論
It's a great tld in my opinion
apwn
·4 か月前·議論
well. you find the ultimate job. you hire yourself. But you are right, it could be improved
apwn
·4 か月前·議論
Hi HN,

I kept seeing the same pattern:

Smart people sending dozens of applications. No replies. Not because they’re unqualified — but because inboxes are saturated.

It made me think: employment works because it creates structure.

Clear role. Clear term. Clear deliverables. Clear consequences.

Entrepreneurs and builders rarely give themselves that structure.

So I built hired.wtf.

Instead of applying to companies, you send your CV to yourself. The app interviews you and generates a fixed-term employment contract between “Employer You” and “Employee You.”

It includes: • Role title • Term (30/60/90 days) • Deliverables & KPIs • Performance review schedule • Termination clause

The idea is simple: Turn vague goals into binding commitments.

It’s not a productivity tracker. It’s a psychological contract engine.

I’m curious: • Does formal structure actually change behavior? • Would you use something like this? • What would make it genuinely useful vs gimmicky?

Would love your feedback.

— Thomas
apwn
·5 か月前·議論
I rebuilt FTX’s venture and equity investments using public bankruptcy filings, sale motions, and reported funding rounds.

The goal was to answer a simple question:

If those investments were still held today, what would they be worth based on the latest reported valuations?

A few notes:

• All figures are sourced and linked • Each estimate has a confidence label • Assumptions are documented in the methodology section • If anything looks incorrect, I would genuinely appreciate corrections

This is an independent reconstruction using public information, not speculation.